Search for: "Dietze v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 118
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2016, 10:11 am
Parks, LLC v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] New York’s ‘aggravated harassment’ statute is unconstitutionally overbroad and vague
13 May 2014, 1:08 pm
In People v Dietze (75 NY2d 47 [1989]), this Court struck down a similar harassment statute, former Penal Law § 240.25, which prohibited the use of abusive or obscene language with the intent to harass, annoy or alarm another person. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 12:46 pm
DIETZ. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
Nwauche, A Customary Law of the Afrikaner People of South Africa, (in ES Nwauche (ed) Citizenship and Customary Law in Africa, Centre for African Legal Studies, 69-85 (2020)).John Picton, Lëhtimaki v Cooper: Duty and Jurisdiction in Charity Law, ((2021) 84 Modern Law Review 383).Cindy Lott, Mary Shelly & Nathan Dietz, Regulatory Breadth Index: A New Measurement of State-Level Charity Regulation (November 9, 2020).From SSRN (Religious Law):Fajri… [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 3:32 am
Contrary to the determination of the Supreme Court, these allegations are sufficient to state a viable cause of action to disgorge legal fees (see Jay Dietz & Assoc. of Nassau County, Ltd. v Breslow & Walker, LLP, 153 AD3d at 506). [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 12:51 pm
United States. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 1:45 pm
Park Dietz for this metaphor. [read post]
2 May 2022, 2:43 pm
Dietz & Watson, Inc., 679 F.3d 1372, 1378 (Fed. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:57 am
United States, 536 U.S. 1014 (2002). [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 2:59 am
Dietze, 75 NY2d 47, 51 [1989], citing Terminiello v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 1:39 pm
From J.F. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 6:23 am
MCMILLAN V. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 4:07 am
Sanchez Valle, Dietz v. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 6:50 am
United States), and the power of a judge, after dismissing jurors in a case, to recall the jury for further deliberation (Dietz v. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 11:51 am
State v. [read post]
6 Sep 2023, 7:21 am
State v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 3:54 am
Dietze, 75 NY2d 47, 51 [1989], citing Terminiello v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 2:41 pm
Alex Dietz, McCrory v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 5:52 pm
Dietz & Watson, 679 F.3d 1372, 1377 (Fed. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 9:07 am
The Federal Circuit Court of Appeals recognized in the recent case of Mintz v Dietz & Watson that if either (a) the problem or (b) the solution is non-obvious, then the invention meets the non-obvious requirement for patentability. [read post]
