Search for: "Disciplinary Counsel v. Cohen"
Results 1 - 20
of 33
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2019, 9:16 am
In Debra Cohen v. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:50 am
To the extent that plaintiff bases her legal malpractice claim on rule 1.4(a)(1)(iii) of the Rules of Professional Conduct, an allegation of legal malpractice based on a violation of the disciplinary rules does not, without other allegations supporting the cause of action[*2], support a malpractice claim (Cohen v Kachroo, 115 AD3d 512, 513 [1st Dept 2014]). [read post]
21 May 2010, 9:26 am
" Leoris & Cohen, P.C. v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Second, the PA disciplinary board is considering sanctions against Baldwin for this conduct. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Second, the PA disciplinary board is considering sanctions against Baldwin for this conduct. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 7:55 am
Cohen, J.D. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 8:35 pm
"); In re Tsoutsouris, 748 N.E.2d 856, 859 (Ind. 2001); Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 10:28 am
” (Dushkin v. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 4:44 am
Along came the case of Rubenstein v. [read post]
4 May 2024, 10:35 am
Because respondent is now cooperating with disciplinary counsel, SCOV grants her motion to dissolve the interim suspension and she gets her license back. [read post]
9 May 2022, 3:16 am
While plaintiff cites to cases where a legal malpractice claim was held viable despite a settlement in the underlying action [Cohen v. [read post]
17 Aug 2022, 4:50 am
However, the violation of a disciplinary rule or ethical obligations does not, without more, generate a cause of action for legal malpractice (Guiles v Simser, 35 AD3d 1054, 1056 [2006]; Weintraub v Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim, & Ballon, 172 AD2d 254 [1991]). [read post]
claiming to provide services then referring out can be false advertising, but P must still show harm
26 Feb 2018, 5:26 am
Larry Pitt & Associates v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 4:00 am
[FN7]"Now, the case of Mallin v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am
District Court (Eastern District of Michigan) in the King v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 6:12 am
In fact, L’Abbate moved to be relieved as Marcum’s counsel due to the potential conflict and the motion was not decided because the Litigation settled two days after it was filed (see Conway v Marcum & Kliegman, LLP, et al, NY County (Index No. 652236/2014), Dkt Nos. 605, 611, 617). [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 3:32 am
“An attorney who violates a disciplinary rule may be discharged for cause and is not entitled to fees for any services rendered” (Jay Dietz & Assoc. of Nassau County, Ltd. v Breslow & Walker, LLP, 153 AD3d 503, 506; see Matter of Montgomery, 272 NY 323, 326; Saint Annes Dev. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 1:46 pm
The Court ordered counsel to provide a copy of the case. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 6:41 pm
.) - Dunn NW v. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 9:37 am
Lower courts are divided on how to evaluate professional speech restrictions, whether those restrictions threaten denial of a license, withdrawal of a license, or other disciplinary action. [read post]
