Search for: "Disciplinary Counsel v. Miller"
Results 1 - 20
of 56
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jan 2015, 8:16 am
In People v. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 8:03 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 4:00 am
The decision demonstrates that an individual against whom disciplinary charges have been filed cannot avoid the consequences of disciplinary action being taken against him or her by refusing to appear at the disciplinary hearing. [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 9:39 am
Matter of Elizabeth Miller Nabors v Town of Somers Petitioner, Elizabeth Miller Nabors, began working part time for the Town of Somers in 2003. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 10:23 am
Miller received a five-minute penalty and a playing-time disciplinary penalty…. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:22 am
Employee suspended without pay in excess of the time authorized by §75 may be entitled to be paid for some or all of such suspension without payElizabeth Miller Nabors v Town of Somers, 2010 NY Slip Op 03089, Decided on April 13, 2010, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentElizabeth Miller Nabors began working part time for the Town of Somers. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 6:08 am
Violations of disciplinary or ethical rules do not, by themselves, give rise to a cause of action (Sumo Container Sta. v Evans, Orr, Pacelli, Norton & Laffan, 278 AD2d 169, 170-171 [1st Dept 2000]; Lavanant v General Acc. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 10:17 am
") AC29562 - Miller v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 8:36 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York (Julie Steiner of counsel), for respondent. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 10:00 pm
Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York (Julie Steiner of counsel), for respondent. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
ROYSTON, RAYZOR, VICKERY, & WILLIAMS, LLP v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 4:59 am
In Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 4:59 am
In Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 12:02 pm
" However, the decision continued, the letter preceded the dates of the disciplinary hearing conducted by the Town, the date that the Nabors suffered "actual harm" was July 5, 2006, and/or July 6, 2006, when she appeared at the disciplinary hearing without counsel as a direct result of the refusal of CSEA to represent her.However, Nabors had not commenced her action against CSEA until August 2007 and thus, said the Appellate Division, her claims The… [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 5:57 am
The school district’s attorney, Frank Miller, Esq., said. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 6:46 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:56 am
By Ronald Miller, J.D. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
MILLER WILLIAM G. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
MILLER WILLIAM G. [read post]
