Search for: "Disciplinary Counsel v. Mills"
Results 1 - 20
of 40
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2010, 3:10 am
Mills, 296 AD2d 704 and Elmore v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 10:35 pm
Continental Cas. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 1:03 am
The suit will proceed against the three and Stan Chesley, who has confidential disciplinary charges pending against him in Kentucky; "Bar Counsel officials have stated in his disciplinary proceedings that they're seeking Chesley's disbarment. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:52 am
Further, the Court held that Mills was required to disclose information about his actions in the Fen-Phen fee-splitting arrangement because “Mills was aware that he had engaged in conduct that led to the disbarment of him and two of his co-counsel.” [read post]
9 Jun 2009, 3:49 am
However, we also hold that the University violated theAdministrative Procedure Act by conducting Mills's disciplinary hearing in secret. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:52 am
Further, the Court held that Mills was required to disclose information about his actions in the Fen-Phen fee-splitting arrangement because “Mills was aware that he had engaged in conduct that led to the disbarment of him and two of his co-counsel. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 6:47 am
Under the terms of the CFA all sums recovered from the opponent were payable to RPC and counsel in priority to the client. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 5:01 pm
Porter v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
At the same time, courts recognize that every disciplinary situation is different and are pre-disposed to accord “much deference” to the employer’s determination regarding the penalty to be imposed [Ahsaf v Nyquist, 37 NY2d 182], especially with respect to quasi-military organizations such as a police department or a similar law enforcement agency [Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32].In Gradel v Sullivan Co. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 9:50 am
" The Court cites Smith v. [read post]
29 Sep 2008, 1:52 am
The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut in the case of Doninger v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 7:39 am
In a system in which review of constitutional violations in death cases may hinge on a finding of ineffective assistance of counsel, courts may be loath to refer counsel for disciplinary hearings in cases of run-of-the-mill IAC. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 1:01 pm
Dulaney v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 5:14 am
Last week, the 6th Circuit decided Richardson v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 5:14 am
Last week, the 6th Circuit decided Richardson v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 5:24 am
Katz v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
In Holt v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
In Holt v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 7:39 pm
” Ex parte Jamie Ray Mills, 2010 Ala. [read post]
