Search for: "Distribution Support, LTD"
Results 21 - 40
of 667
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2022, 9:21 am
., Ltd.: Plaintiffs here make no allegation that either Mr. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 3:35 am
Background Grampian MacLennan’s Distribution Services Limited (the “Company”) operated throughout the UK providing distribution services. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 2:35 pm
Dissolution of marriage -- Equitable distribution -- Error to treat an IRA account inherited by husband from his mother as a marital asset and to award it to wife -- Where parties entered into a stipulation to sell a commercial marital property, with wife to receive $250,000 from the sale proceeds, which she was to use as temporary support for herself and children, it was error for trial court to decline to treat the funds given to wife as either previously paid support or… [read post]
29 Jul 2021, 8:04 am
Daikin Industries, Ltd. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 4:52 pm
The central allegation in the complaint is that "[p]laintiffs are informed and believe that each Defendant, without the permission or consent of Plaintiffs, has used, and continues to use, an online media distribution system to download and/or distribute certain of the Copyrighted Recordings...Through his or her continuous and ongoing acts of downloading and/or distributing to the public the Copyrighted Recordings, each Defendant has violated Plaintiffs'… [read post]
8 Apr 2014, 5:25 pm
Supreme Court of Florida.Child support -- It was an abuse of discretion for trial court to fail to set amount of child support obligation before applying amount of child's derivative social security disability benefit -- Court should have calculated monthly child support obligation, explicitly included that amount in final judgment, and only then applied derivative benefits to reduce or pay that obligation -- Nevertheless, court reached correct result because derivative… [read post]
1 Aug 2019, 1:00 am
The Manchester Ship Canal Company Ltd v Vauxhall Motors Ltd was heard on 9th and 10th July. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:08 am
Delaware Chancery Enjoins Merger Vote Pending Distribution Of Corrective Disclosures Here is news from Tom Bayliss of Abrams & Bayliss: On May 13th, the Delaware Court of Chancery issued the attached opinion in Maric Capital Master Fund Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2014, 7:13 am
Trans Video Electronics, Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 10:00 am
A bipartisan bill, titled the “Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act,” was approved unanimously by the US House Energy and Commerce Committee on Thursday, which would make it “unlawful for an entity to distribute, maintain, or update…a foreign adversary controlled application,” naming ByteDance, Ltd., TikTok and their subsidiaries as foreign adversaries. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 9:21 am
Enterprises Ltd. v Defence Construction (1951) Ltd., [1994] 164 AR 399 (ABQB), affd [1997] 196 AR 124 (ABCA), revd [1999] 1 SCR 619, online: LexUM http://scc.lexum.org/en/1999/1999scr1-619/1999scr1-619.html Facts The respondent, Defence Construction (‘Defence’), invited tenders for construction of a water pumping and distribution system on a Canadian Forces Base in Alberta. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 9:53 am
And now, on to the finale - could DarkCoderSc be prosecuted for creating, supporting, and distributing the DarkComet RAT.NO (in the United States)First, DarkComet RAT can be easily distinguished from Mariposa and Blackshades, on the following grounds:1. [read post]
26 Aug 2009, 10:25 am
Lyondell Chemical Company sought court approval yesterday for its non-debtor subsidiary, Lyondell Centennial Corporation, to enter into a joint venture agreement with Sumitomo Chemical Company, Ltd. [read post]
3 Jan 2016, 4:04 pm
In the case of Theedom v Nourish Training Ltd ([2015] EWHC 3769 (QB) [pdf]) HHJ Moloney QC decided, on the trial of a preliminary issue, that the claimant had established serious harm to reputation” for the purposes of section 1 of the Defamation Act 2013. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 3:01 am
" The Board concluded that all three Lens.com factors support the refusal. [read post]
22 Jul 2021, 12:40 pm
The Board’s obviousness findings are not supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:00 am
The question of “pass-on” considers whether an overcharge caused by a restriction of competition is passed downstream through the distribution chain. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 11:09 am
Summary judgement against distributors of conditional access cards to obtain access to foreign broadcasts was refused in an English Court hearing (Premier League Ltd v QC Leisure and others [2008] EWHC 44 (Ch)) a couple of weeks ago. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 10:05 pm
Lupin Ltd., 403 F. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 4:01 am
., Ltd., Opposition No. 91247343 (September 6, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge George C. [read post]
