Search for: "District of Columbia v. Coleman"
Results 1 - 20
of 38
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2024, 11:29 am
” District of Columbia v. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 7:01 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit delicately put it – “property owned by the United States government. [read post]
9 Apr 2022, 3:01 am
Doe v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
Indeed, this bias from inadequate control of confounding infects several pending pharmaceutical multi-district litigations. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 2:41 pm
Coleman v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 3:30 am
Ulrich begins with an overview of the Supreme Court’s two primary Second Amendment cases, District of Columbia v. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:28 pm
As an example, in 2014 the Federal Bureau of Investigation had a “takedown” of more than twenty individuals and agencies for Medicaid fraud in the District of Columbia. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 9:41 am
Rather than acknowledging a fiduciary’s consent as “lawful consent” under the federal statute (id.; see Ajemian v Yahoo! [read post]
11 Feb 2020, 12:10 pm
James Coleman sued the Soccer Association of Columbia. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 6:47 pm
" Chief Justice Hughes, the OLC suggests, was wrong to pay attention to that example in his plurality opinion in Coleman v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Carl Coleman, Seton Hall University School of Law, Ethical Issues in Managing Vector-Borne Diseases Stacie Kershner, Georgia State University College of Law, Public Health Law and the E-Scooter Epidemic Noah Smith-Drelich, Columbia Law School, Food Tax Substitution Effects B. [read post]
21 Nov 2018, 6:18 am
As an example of the latter, the Supreme Court cited its holding in Coleman v. [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 3:25 am
Coleman's Publ'g House 1887).) [read post]
31 May 2018, 11:18 am
In the majority opinion in Coleman v. [read post]
3 Nov 2017, 4:23 am
District of Columbia, which involves the effect of a tolling provision in the federal supplemental-jurisdiction statute on litigants who want to pursue state-court claims after related federal claims have been dismissed. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am
Coleman, Arica L. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 4:54 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit reversed. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 4:42 pm
By Reba Weiss and Harrison Owens In Coleman-Lee v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 6:37 am
Circuit found some of her memos were disclosures protected by the District of Columbia Whistleblower Protection Act and her discharge for refusing a fit-for-duty psychological exam could be found retaliatory (Coleman v. [read post]
