Search for: "District of Columbia v. Johnson" Results 21 - 40 of 345
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2016, 6:52 am by Kevin Johnson
A district court in the Southern District of Texas enjoined the program’s implementation. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 8:17 pm
Ted Strickland    Southern District of Ohio at Columbus 08a0369p.06 2008/10/10 Johnson v. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 6:01 am by Tanner Larkin
District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed the case, Atchley v. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 11:19 am by William Ford
District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed House Republicans’ lawsuit seeking to enjoin the use of the House of Representatives’s proxy voting system. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 8:00 am by Zoe Tillman
He filed suit against the nonprofit and one of its doctors in District of Columbia Superior Court in August 2005. [read post]
29 May 2008, 5:55 pm
Murphy    Middle District of Tennessee at Columbia 08a0276n.06 Woods v. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 11:49 am
Moe     Western District of Michigan at Grand Rapids 08a0677n.06  Germany-Johnson v. [read post]
21 Dec 2012, 3:00 pm by Kurt T. Koehler
  Judge Emmet Sullivan of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia held that the Plaintiffs lacked standing to sue. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 2:01 am
District of Columbia , 487 F.3d 941 (D.C.Cir. 2007), which held that a public use challenger need not seek compensation in state procedures before coming to federal court. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 1:46 am
District of Columbia, (D DC, March 12, 2008), the federal district court for the District of Columbia held that it lacked personal jurisdiction over an individual prison employee who was sued for damages for denying plaintiff his leather kufi that he wears for religious reasons.In Scott v. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 7:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
However, his bid for punitive damages was tossed (Hann v. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 2:21 pm by David Kopel
Here is the Summary of Argument: Over a decade after this Court's decision in District of Columbia v. [read post]