Search for: "District of Columbia v. Johnson"
Results 61 - 80
of 346
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2020, 4:01 am
The addition of electoral votes for the District of Columbia because of the 23rd Amendment made the electoral college total an equally divisible number: 538 electors. [read post]
30 Oct 2020, 4:10 am
Bd. of Educ. v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
Consider only the fact that in the 2016 election, the 39 million people of California—roughly two million more than live in the twenty-one smallest state, plus the District of Columbia, combined, received only 55 electoral votes, while the 21 states plus D.C. got a total of 95. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 11:19 am
District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed House Republicans’ lawsuit seeking to enjoin the use of the House of Representatives’s proxy voting system. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 5:01 am
District Court for the District of Columbia for a hearing on House Republicans’ effort to enjoin the use of the proxy voting system developed to help the chamber conduct business more safely in the midst of the pandemic. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 10:00 am
In 1867, President Andrew Johnson vetoed a bill granting adult citizens of the District — including Black men — the right to vote. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 5:14 am
They closed up Wall Street—the financial district of the world, and they had total domination. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 6:01 am
Roberts Court: District of Columbia v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 6:00 am
Roberts Court: District of Columbia v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
22 Mar 2020, 5:12 pm
Structural Surveillance, Iowa Law Review, Forthcoming, Andrew Guthrie Ferguson, American University Washington College of Law; University of the District of Columbia – David A. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of New York. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 3:49 am
District Court for the District of Columbia, Hoffa v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 9:54 am
Johnson & Johnson Consumer Prods., Inc., 212 F.3d 493, 510 n.15 (9th Cir. 2000). [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 10:33 am
”) CEI and NR argued that the claims should be dismissed under the District of Columbia’s Anti-SLAPP Act, a law intended to provide legal protection for statements involving matters of public concern. [read post]
13 Nov 2019, 2:15 pm
Johnson & Johnson VisionCare, Inc., 818 F.3d 1320 (Fed. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 7:35 am
Then-Rep. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm
Research and Resources Facial Recognition and the Fourth Amendment, Andrew Guthrie Ferguson, University of the District of Columbia – David A. [read post]
10 Sep 2019, 2:11 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia as part of its petition to obtain grand jury material underlying the Mueller report) are more restrictive, but the context for dealing with that material also differs from earlier episodes. [read post]
30 Aug 2019, 5:41 pm
”Johnson & Johnston Assocs. v. [read post]
