Search for: "District of Columbia v. Mitchell"
Results 1 - 20
of 82
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2024, 1:51 pm
Trump v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
(And the fact that Trump’s counsel Jonathan Mitchell doesn’t make any effort to defend this argument should tell you something about its prospects.) [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am
Canada On 2 January 2024, the Supreme Court of British Columbia awarded summary judgement on the issue of quantum in favour of the plaintiff in the case of Pineau v Glacier Media Inc 2024 BCSC 4. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 6:00 am
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
District of Columbia v. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
Supreme Court’s ruling that struck down Roe v. [read post]
29 Oct 2022, 3:44 pm
ShareNearly 100 amicus briefs were filed in Students for Fair Admissions v. the University of North Carolina and Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
District Court for the District of Columbia. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 6:30 am
”[5][6] Justice Thomas’s plurality opinion in Mitchell v. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated the repeal of the Clean Power Plan, vacated the ACE Rule, and sent the issue back to the EPA for more proceedings. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
Supreme Court Industrial Union Dep’t v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am
City of Columbia, 305 F.3d 314, 323 (5th Cir. 2002) (en banc). [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 5:01 am
District Court for the District of Columbia that the information sought by the committee “is relevant only to serve the Select Committee’s stated purpose of engaging in ad-hoc law enforcement and its unstated purpose of antagonizing its political adversaries. [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 2:01 pm
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit rejected these claims on the ground that the Constitution’s speech-or-debate clause prohibits judicial review of legislative actions such as voting. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 2:24 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 1:31 pm
The case is New Line Cinema v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
Mitchell v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
Mitchell v. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 11:12 am
" District of Columbia v. [read post]
