Search for: "District of Columbia v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2012, 8:07 am
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, No. 11-CV-567 (D.C. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 10:23 am
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, the plaintiff Veronica Tinsley was at the Cheverly Metro Station in Maryland when she slipped and fell on the wet platform. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 8:10 am
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, No. 15-CV-711, slip op. [read post]
5 Jun 2016, 8:10 am
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, No. 15-CV-711, slip op. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 1:13 pm
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, Civil Action No. 15-2092 (RBW) (D.D.C. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 6:25 am
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, September 2, 2016, Walton, R.). [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 8:24 am
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, No. 14-1289, 2017 U.S. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 2:00 am
Area Transit Auth., 2020 U.S. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 7:30 am
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority).Mr. [read post]
14 May 2008, 9:10 pm
Mineta, 319 F.Supp.2d 69 (D.D.C. 2004), that the D.C. area Metropolitan Area Transit Authority unconstitutionally prohibited pro-marijuana advertisements in subway stations, where WMATA's decision was based on federal legislation prohibiting such advertisements in transit systems. [read post]
14 May 2008, 9:00 pm
Mineta, 319 F.Supp.2d 69 (D.D.C. 2004), that the D.C. area Metropolitan Area Transit Authority unconstitutionally prohibited pro-marijuana advertisements in subway stations, where WMATA's decision was based on federal legislation prohibiting such advertisements in transit systems. [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 7:02 am
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority, 18-1455, involving bus-advertisement policies that prohibit religious themes, Justice Neil Gorsuch, joined by Thomas, issued an opinion respecting denial. [read post]
6 Apr 2020, 10:09 am
” However, the Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority, known as WMATA, rejected the advertisement because of its religious nature. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:51 am
If those who govern the District of Columbia decide that the Nation’s Capital should be beautiful as well as sanitary, there is nothing in the Fifth Amendment that stands in the way. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
In Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am
Lobbyists who have a smaller salary and work in specialist areas or for public interest groups are less overconfident, or even underestimate their success. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am
Click Here US District Court Decision in US v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
District Judge Jed Rakoff. [read post]
