Search for: "Doe et al v. Sebelius et al"
Results 41 - 54
of 54
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2010, 8:09 am
Sebelius, et al., 10-369). [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 9:45 am
Florida, et al., 11-398). [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:05 am
I was likely not alone as the interest over National Federation of Independent Business, et al v. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 11:45 am
The United States Supreme Court actually rejected the notion that the Federal Government can require an individual to purchase health insurance in a now-famous 2012 decision authored by Chief Justice John Roberts in National Federation of Independent Business et al. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 8:23 am
SEBELIUS [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 8:10 am
Lo cierto es que este caso (NFBI -National Federation of Independent Business- v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 5:56 pm
The ABA Business Law Section Backgrounder may be accessed HERE. 1UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURTNORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMANORTHEASTERN DIVISIONNATIONAL SMALL BUSINESS )UNITED, d/b/a the NATIONAL )SMALL BUSINESS )ASSOCIATION, et al., ))Plaintiffs, ))v. ) Case No. 5:22-cv-1448-LCB)JANET YELLEN, in her official )capacity as Secretary of the )Treasury, et al., ))Defendants. )MEMORANDUM OPINIONThe late Justice Antonin Scalia once remarked that federal judges… [read post]
24 Sep 2011, 3:58 am
http://j.st/cqz Father M, et al. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 11:46 am
As the Supreme Court recently recognized in Arizona v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 4:38 pm
Courts of Appeal after Blakely v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:46 pm
BISHOP, SR., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
As some observers have suggested, for example, Roberts et al. might continue to issue rulings that amount to reversals of precedent without calling them reversals.The most widely discussed example of this would be for the Court not to overrule Roe explicitly (because that would energize even some otherwise conservative voters) but instead to decide that there simply are no abortion restrictions that constitute an “undue burden. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 9:03 pm
On Tuesday, March 27, the Supreme Court will meet for the second day of hearings on constitutional issues surrounding the new federal health care law. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am
Even metaphorically, this does not describe James Madison’s relation to the United States Constitution. [read post]
