Search for: "Doe v. Ball"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,760
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Dec 2006, 1:11 pm
Planet Bingo v. [read post]
3 Sep 2009, 11:52 am
Does it matter that the theft was in broad daylight in an occupied lot with many employees around? [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 7:54 pm
Charnes got the ball rolling withThe text of the America Invents Act, the statutory history, the statute's policy goals, and this Court's decision in Cuozzo all confirm that Section 314(d) precludes judicial review of the director's time-barred determination under section 315(b).Justice Kavanaugh spoke of "shenanigans":Cuozzo had a part that, of course, responded to concerns that have been raised, I --I think in the dissent, and says we --our interpretation… [read post]
9 May 2024, 9:14 am
Ball State University, where a student sued alleging a professor’s advances created a hostile learning environment, and Doe v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 4:06 am
Parks, LLC v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 2:11 pm
This article unfortunately does not offer a crystal ball to solve those concerns because the most honest answer at this point is, “we just do not know. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 10:34 am
Por: Víctor Manuel Guízar López INTERNET HAS BECOME A TOOL THAT HAS UNIMAGINABLY REDESIGNED THE MEANS BY WHICH HUMAN BEINGS COMMUNICATE AND HAS TURNED OUT TO BE THE PURE EMBODIMENT OF GLOBALIZATION. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 10:20 am
CommentThis decision highlights the importance of carefully ensuring that all formalities for the transfer of an EUTM under Article 20 EUTMR are fulfilled, as it does not necessarily follow that the EUIPO will infer that a transfer is justified based on any party's legal entitlement to a mark. [read post]
5 Aug 2013, 5:33 am
One of the topics we discussed was the impact of the Supreme Court's ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 12:06 pm
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in Vance v. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 6:32 pm
Veoh.He queries Does FRCP 68 Apply to Copyright Cases? [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:26 pm
If such decision maker has questionable motivations, lacks proper perspective, does not grasp the flexibility in the concepts in play, does not grasp the restraints on concepts in play, does not follow the proper processes involved, and lacks the detail, courage, and tenacity needed to reach the proper “deduction” or “call,” on the face of things the formalist, too, should have reason to re-examine any “deduction” or “call”… [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:26 pm
If such decision maker has questionable motivations, lacks proper perspective, does not grasp the flexibility in the concepts in play, does not grasp the restraints on concepts in play, does not follow the proper processes involved, and lacks the detail, courage, and tenacity needed to reach the proper “deduction” or “call,” on the face of things the formalist, too, should have reason to re-examine any “deduction” or “call”… [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 3:55 am
The copy may well be cheaper but that also does not increase choice of price. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 7:30 am
This does not mean the insurer won’t have to pay. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 10:37 am
Lewis Operating Corporation v. [read post]
26 Jul 2013, 6:07 am
Justice Ball in Demcak v. [read post]
15 Aug 2008, 8:09 pm
Incredible Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:22 pm
By the way does anyone know the political party of the judges on the Ohio Supreme Court. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 5:00 am
For this reason, an Louisiana federal court in Slocum v. [read post]
