Search for: "Doe v. Black" Results 1 - 20 of 6,851
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 May 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
[Eagle-eyed readers might notice that the court cites Saunders v. [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:49 am by Eugene Volokh
For instance, some people argue that it's illegitimate to deny to Jews a right to have a nation of Israel, because it already does exist, but legitimate to deny the Palestinians a right to have a nation of Palestine, because it has not been officially recognized. [read post]
3 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Likewise, the characterization of cannabis as a health hazard does not mean that it is, in fact, dangerous or that is does not offer significant medicinal benefits. [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:00 am by Donnelly L. McDowell
Despite its length, the Guidance conspicuously omits any reference to last fall’s landmark decision in FTC v. [read post]
1 May 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
”  The Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 10:20 am by David Aaron
Absent an emergency such as an imminent threat to life, the FBI may only review the “contents” (a subset of “information” that does not include metadata) of communications retrieved through a query used in a non-national security criminal investigation if the FISC finds probable cause to believe that those contents include evidence of a criminal activity, contraband, fruits of a crime, or property used to commit a crime. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
Prelude to Litigation Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) was a widely used direct α-adrenergic agonist used as a medication to control cold symptoms and to suppress appetite for weight loss.[1] In 1972, an over-the-counter (OTC) Advisory Review Panel considered the safety and efficacy of PPA-containing nasal decongestant medications, leading, in 1976, to a recommendation that the agency label these medications as “generally recognized as safe and effective. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:22 am by Peter Mahler
Delaware law, for example, does not authorize a claim for judicial dissolution of a close corporation based on shareholder oppression. [read post]
4 Apr 2024, 6:32 am by Michael C. Dorf
He successfully argued New York Times v. [read post]
3 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
These are not secret analyses; they are public documents for the whole world to see.[4] Even parties that argue in court that their conduct does not implicate the federal securities laws have themselves used the Howey framework internally for years to evaluate crypto offerings.[5] Of course, that doesn’t mean that all crypto products are offered as “investment contracts” and are therefore securities. [read post]