Search for: "Doe v. Flowers" Results 1 - 20 of 559
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jun 2019, 7:29 am by Steve Erickson
Today, SCOTUS handed down the decision in Flowers v. [read post]
28 May 2013, 1:45 am
The IPKat does some fieldresearch into flowers ...Connoisseurs of long judgments will know that Interflora Inc and Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer Plc and Flowers Direct Online Limited [2013] EWHC 1291 (Ch) was decided last Monday, 21 May 2013, in the Chancery Division, High Court of Justice, England and Wales, by (who else?) [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 3:17 am by Howard Friedman
Supreme Court, by a vote of 6-3, denied review in the long-running case of Arlene's Flowers, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 12:31 pm by Eugene Volokh
The court concluded that the subpoena would be enforced only if plaintiff could provide a "prima facie showing" on its claim of defamation, based on "evidence satisfying the summary judgment standard" (the Delaware Doe v. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 4:15 am by Howard Friedman
In the case, the Washington state Supreme Court held that a florist shop's refusal to provide flowers for a same-sex wedding constitutes sexual orientation discrimination under the Washington Law Against Discrimination, and that enforcement of the law does not violate the constitutional rights of the floral shop owner. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 7:45 am
In 2017, the Washington Supreme Court ruled unanimously for the same-sex couple in Arlene’s Flowers v. [read post]