Search for: "Doe v. Forrest" Results 61 - 80 of 213
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2018, 12:10 pm by Brian Sutherland
Forrest of the Southern District of New York opened the door to new copyright infringement suits in the Second Circuit and beyond with her ruling in Goldman v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 12:10 pm by Brian Sutherland
Forrest of the Southern District of New York opened the door to new copyright infringement suits in the Second Circuit and beyond with her ruling in Goldman v. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 3:49 am by Ben
  Judge Forrest in her summary judgment has rejected the Server Test by saying that “when defendants caused the embedded Tweets to appear on their websites, their actions violated plaintiff’s exclusive display right; the fact that the image was hosted on a server owned and operated by an unrelated third party (Twitter) does not shield them from this result”. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 11:08 am by Robert Laplaca
Forrest of the United States District Court of the Southern District of New York issued a well-analyzed Opinion in the case Goldman v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 8:20 am
 In a judgment issued yesterday, US District Judge Katherine B Forrest held that "when defendants caused the embedded Tweets to appear on their websites, their actions violated plaintiff’s exclusive display right; the fact that the image was hosted on a server owned and operated by an unrelated third party (Twitter) does not shield them from this result. [read post]
4 Jan 2018, 11:08 am by Marie-Andree Weiss
” The New York courts have consistently interpreted the law narrowly and the Appellate Division held in September 2016 that the Grand Theft Auto V video game, “does not fall under the statutory definitions of ‘advertising’ or ‘trade. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 4:31 am by SHG
Weinstein, Does Religion Have a Role in Criminal Sentencing? [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 12:19 pm by Zuri Blackmon
  “Section 502(b)(2), however, does not mean that interest ceases to accrue or that a debtor is exonerated therefrom. [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Given the [*2]absence of detailed facts, the legal malpractice cause of action should have been dismissed (see Janker v Silver, Forrester & Lesser, P.C., 135 AD3d 908, 910 [2016]; Rodriguez v Jacoby & Meyers, LLP, 126 AD3d at 1185-1186; Kreamer v Town of Oxford, 96 AD3d 1128, 1128 [2012]; compare Soule v Lozada, 232 AD2d 825, 825 [1996]). [read post]