Search for: "Doe v. General Hospital of District of Columbia"
Results 61 - 80
of 150
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Apr 2023, 6:10 am
In 2019 generic mifepristone was approved. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 6:10 am
In 2019 generic mifepristone was approved. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 5:01 am
He responded, Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County v. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:30 am
Does it really need fixing? [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 9:36 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit did not rule on the APA question because it found that the Medicare Act did not actually incorporate the APA’s interpretive-rule exception. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 7:30 am
Doe the court ruled that a school district’s policy of allowing student-led and student-initiated prayer at football games violates the Constitution’s establishment clause. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:17 am
As noted there, generally speaking, what an employee does when they are not at work is none of the employer’s business. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 11:48 am
In that action, three hospitals affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Health Plan, an HMO, have appealed a ruling by the federal district court for the District of Columbia holding that, although the hospitals did not directly contract with the federal government, they were still subject to OFCCP jurisdiction as federal subcontractors (UPMC Braddock v Harris, March 30, 2013, (96 EPD ¶44,801)). [read post]
5 Jun 2015, 5:59 pm
CVSGs Dollar General Corporation v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:00 am
Rochow v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 1:03 pm
District Court for the District of Columbia, the plaintiff sought to employ a Computer Systems Analyst who held a U.S. [read post]
14 May 2021, 9:41 am
Attorney for the District of Columbia. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:40 am
” (See WJLA-TV v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 2:04 pm
Neither does the examination of the services at issue somehow violate church autonomy. [read post]
4 Jan 2014, 9:47 am
Sinai Hospital in New York are resulting in a changing of this picture. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm
Supreme Court denied a request from the Center for Individual Rights (CIR) to rehear Friedrichs v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 12:31 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia set aside the FCC’s expansive interpretation of what constitutes an ATDS and its approach to consent of reassigned wireless numbers. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 2:18 pm
The case is Missouri v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:21 am
FOOTNOTES [1] Dipendra Tiwari, et al. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2015, 11:24 am
Together with the serial relist of Friedman, the fate of Caetano will give our clearest indication yet whether the Court has any appetite to add gloss to District of Columbia v. [read post]
