Search for: "Doe v. Holder" Results 21 - 40 of 6,682
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2012, 12:18 pm by BuckleySandler
On May 10, the FTC released an advisory opinion affirming that the Holder in Due Course Rule does not limit or preclude a consumer’s right to recovery other than to restrict awards to monies paid under a contract. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 6:41 pm by Margot Patterson
Doe (2005 FCA 193), as well as cases from the U.S. and UK: to weigh and balance the privacy rights of potentially innocent users of the internet versus the right of copyright holders to enforce their rights. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 9:36 am
Just because a plaintiff might not carry its burden of “non-infringement” does not mean the patent holder has proven infringement. [read post]
6 May 2019, 2:59 pm by John L. Culhane, Jr.
Also in the notice, the FTC affirms that the ability of a consumer to bring an affirmative claim based on the Holder Rule does not depend on whether state law authorizes affirmative actions against holders. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 2:58 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
The Supreme Court, in its 5-4 decision today in Shelby v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 9:56 am by Jon
The case of Jefferson Wayne Schrader and Second Amendment Foundation v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 7:00 am by Glenn Cohen
Holder from John Robertson, which I think John will be publishing soon. [read post]
2 May 2023, 12:29 am by Brianna Mayes
The Staff Notice does not contain anything new – rather, it confirms that “positive” Voting Agreements (i.e., those requiring a security holder to vote for management’s recommendations) may require shareholder approval. [read post]