Search for: "Doe v. Johnston" Results 41 - 60 of 348
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2010, 10:39 am by Dave
Now, this is a really important point, I think (and not one that I'd given much thought to before reading the decision) because it does raise both a technical ground of appeal as well as, much more importantly in my eyes, an important right for the applicant on a review to make written/oral submissions (on which see our notes of Banks v Kingston-upon-Thames LBC [2009] HLR 29 & Lambeth LBC v Johnston [2009] HLR 10, esp at [53], again per Rimer LJ). [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 10:39 am by Dave
Now, this is a really important point, I think (and not one that I'd given much thought to before reading the decision) because it does raise both a technical ground of appeal as well as, much more importantly in my eyes, an important right for the applicant on a review to make written/oral submissions (on which see our notes of Banks v Kingston-upon-Thames LBC [2009] HLR 29 & Lambeth LBC v Johnston [2009] HLR 10, esp at [53], again per Rimer LJ). [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
Ct., Monroe County 2004]  ), such a withdrawal does mandate a dissolution unless it is found that “it is not reasonably practicable to carry on the business” (Horning v. [read post]
4 Jul 2017, 10:12 am
This principle does not end our inquiry, however. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 3:15 am
” Determining probation status when employee's service is interrupted by an absence Johnston v Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, App. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 7:31 am
 My conclusion on equivalents is based upon a consideration of the specification of the Patent in this case, and does not establish any wider proposition. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 8:49 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
It also gets around the Prison Litigation Reform Act, which requires inmates to file grievances over their mistreatment before they can file suit in federal court.The case is Johnston v. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 10:00 am by Katherine Gallo
Johnston & Washer (1972) 29 Cal.App.3d 270, 273–275 [105 Cal. [read post]