Search for: "Doe v. Marshall"
Results 161 - 180
of 2,741
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2023, 5:15 pm
Anthony List v. [read post]
4 Feb 2023, 6:30 am
” As Chief Justice Marshall put it (quoting Justice Ginsburg in United States v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm
FootnotesFootnote 1: To the extent that petitioner now challenges the denial of his original request for all trooper disciplinary records statewide, that claim is unpreserved as it was not raised in the petition (see Matter of Urena v Mulligan, 201 AD3d 1215, 1218 [3d Dept 2022]; Marshall v City of Albany, 184 AD3d 1043, 1044 [3d Dept 2020]). [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm
FootnotesFootnote 1: To the extent that petitioner now challenges the denial of his original request for all trooper disciplinary records statewide, that claim is unpreserved as it was not raised in the petition (see Matter of Urena v Mulligan, 201 AD3d 1215, 1218 [3d Dept 2022]; Marshall v City of Albany, 184 AD3d 1043, 1044 [3d Dept 2020]). [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 4:49 am
Marshall Cohen, Sara Murray and Annie Grayer report for CNN. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 12:00 am
In relation to the evidence, Arnold LJ found that Neo’s application failed on the first criterion set out in Ladd v Marshall. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 11:51 am
The SPVA does not require the Coast Guard to promulgate rules, and it is not retroactive. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:59 am
So when religious accommodation was on the table in Trans World Airlines v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 1:59 pm
Marshall, 342 S.W.3d 59, 66 (Tex. 2011) (citing Wagner & Brown, Ltd. v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
Although little known today, Chew Heong v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 11:21 am
The last opinion announced from the bench was in Kansas v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:00 am
Marshal Gail A. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
Supreme Court in August, asking that it revisit its 1977 decision in Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 2:54 pm
In TWA v. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 12:01 am
Supreme Court ruled in McLaurin v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:55 am
” The reason cited is his opinion he wrote in the 1987 case of McCleskey v. [read post]
11 Jan 2023, 3:03 am
Contrary to plaintiffs’ contention, defendants’ failure to comply with the rules concerning retainer agreements (22 NYCRR 1215.1) does not preclude them from recovering in quantum meruit (Frechtman v Gutterman, 140 AD3d 538,538 [1st Dept 2016]; Seth Rubenstein, P.C. v Ganea, 41 AD3d 54, 60-63 [2d Dept 2007]). [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 4:38 am
It’s not common at all, though, to see business dissolution proceedings play out in matrimonial court, which is why a recent decision from Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Kathleen Waterman-Marshall is so fascinating. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 3:00 am
An unsworn report from an expert does not constitute competent evidence to support a motion for summary judgment (see Grasso v Angerami, 79NY2d 813, 814-815 [1991]). [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
” I have no particular brief for high Federalists from New England, but I do wonder what we might think had Garrison actually been influential and several New England states accepted his view and tried to secede, say, after the Supreme Court’s decision in Prigg v. [read post]
