Search for: "Doe v. Pharmacia" Results 1 - 20 of 44
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Aug 2019, 1:42 am
The IPCom guidance are provided for readers' convenience at the end of this post.The IPCom factors have since been applied in Actavis v Pharmacia [2014] EWHC 2265 (stay was ordered), and Eli Lilly v Janssen Sciences [2016] EWHC 313 (stay was not ordered) (IPKat post here).David Stone (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge), applied the IPCom guidance to the fact of the case in Coloplast v Salts. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 11:25 pm
He notes that the Neurim decision seems to be inconsistent with the CJEU’s decisions in MIT, GSK, Pharmacia and Yissum. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 12:36 pm
" appreciates - and those on the other side despise - is what the rule does to warnings and warning causation. [read post]
15 Oct 2012, 1:24 am by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s decision in Morrison v. [read post]
7 May 2013, 8:53 am
I do not detect anything in the decisions of the Court of Appeal in Pharmacia and Unilin Beheer which is inconsistent with this approach and in my judgment is one which this court should adopt. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 2:50 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 RT: [See also the papers in the Xalatan/Travatan case, Pharmacia v. [read post]