Search for: "Doe v. Providence Health Plans" Results 81 - 100 of 3,775
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Health insurance company’s claim for reimbursement for certain medical cost it incurred from the “no fault” automobile insurance carrier denied Aetna Health Plans v Hanover Ins. [read post]
8 Jun 2012, 5:00 pm by Law Lady
Federal Insurance - Health - Federal Regulation Tracking DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES 45 CFR Part 156 Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Data Collection To Support Standards Related to Essential Health Benefits; Recognition of Entities for the Accreditation of Qualified Health Plans Proposed Rule COMMENT DATE: July 5, 2012 77 FR 33133-01Federal Insurance - Property and Casualty - Federal Regulations DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Federal… [read post]
This supposedly increases the cost of healthcare services, and does not allow health plans to be selective about the hospitals or providers that may have lower costs or higher quality care. [read post]
This supposedly increases the cost of healthcare services, and does not allow health plans to be selective about the hospitals or providers that may have lower costs or higher quality care. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 4:10 am
Servs. v Westchester County Human Rights Commn, 2011 NY Slip Op 01030, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentA woman employed by a school district that provides its employees with health insurance coverage through a BOCES "Health Benefits Consortium" had lived with a male partner in a romantic relationship for more than 30 years. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:34 am
  Does the employee get the richer benefit even though not provided for in the formal plan document? [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
The issues arose in a case in which a county health department nurse claimed that the health department discriminated against her after she asserted that her Catholic religious beliefs prevented her from providing birth control, from providing Plan B emergency contraception, and from making abortion referrals. [read post]
28 Dec 2013, 6:22 am by Marty Lederman
  To be sure, the law does require that contraception, and several other specified health care services, be included in any health insurance plan the employers offer to their employees. [read post]
11 Apr 2008, 1:56 pm
Nebraska Unicameral amends medical lien statute Section 52-401 to clarify that medical providers may only claim their discounted fees and charges when they accepted discounts from private health insurance or health benefit plans. [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 7:30 pm
First generation PHRs can be categorized as either stand-alone PHRs, requiring patients to gather and enter their own information, or tethered PHRs, provided by a health plan, provider, or employer sponsor who populated the PHR with information. [read post]