Search for: "Doe v. Schneider"
Results 41 - 60
of 274
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2022, 7:22 am
The district court erred in dismissing these allegations of direct observations as “conclusory,” SPA 31Sce v. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 5:59 am
The Supreme Court said in Garcetti v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 7:34 am
Holzum v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 1:09 pm
In Schneider v. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
Appeals Criminal Law: HearsayR. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 2:27 pm
In ruling in favor of the plaintiff, the Ninth Circuit emphasized the non-delegable nature of the warranty of seaworthiness: “The position taken here by appellant that the duty in respect to seaworthiness does not apply to Schneider, under the facts here present, is in essence an attempt to have us hold that this duty was in substance passed over to Schneider. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 5:04 pm
(Not necessarily religiously discriminatory hostility, of course.)From yesterday's California Court of Appeal decision in Vogelgesang v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 7:27 am
v=ctiKD8jtvV8 Learn more about your ad choices. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 8:11 am
Mark MacCarthy handicaps the Epic v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:15 am
Valerie Schneider is an Assistant Professor at Howard University School of Law. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 5:50 am
In Gardner v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 10:20 pm
Schneider v. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 12:20 pm
Femal v. [read post]
7 Apr 2023, 4:15 am
Plaintiffs’ assertion of a claim under Judiciary Law 487 is unavailing because the amended complaint does not allege defendant attorneys were counsel of record in any proceeding to which plaintiffs were a party (see Platt v Berkowitz, 203 AD3d 447 [1st Dept 2022]). [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 5:26 am
In order for evidence to qualify as documentary, it must be unambiguous, authentic, and undeniable (see Granada Condominium III Assn. v Palomino, 78 AD3d 996, 996-997 [2010]; Fontanetta v John Doe 1, 73 AD3d 78, 86 [2010]). [read post]
23 Apr 2007, 8:03 am
Schneider v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 2:43 pm
Doe, No. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 1:17 pm
“It does the government no good to hold back on its thunder,” she said. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 12:46 pm
But that's not always the case.The case is Vincent v. [read post]
7 Jul 2021, 3:03 am
Contrary to Drexel’s contention, the plaintiff’s claim that Drexel overbilled and charged him for unnecessary legal services is distinct from a legal malpractice cause of action, as the plaintiff’s claim does not challenge the quality of Drexel’s work (see Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d at 416; Tanenbaum v Molinoff, 118 AD3d 774, 775-776). [read post]
