Search for: "Doe v. Sessions" Results 41 - 60 of 4,154
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2018, 5:01 am by Andrew Hamm
Sessions was referring to 2015’s Johnson v. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 7:00 am by Stephanie Zable
The two originally received enhanced sentences under a statute that established mandatory minimum sentence extensions for the use of a firearm in conjunction with a violent felony, but the judge who released them held that the statute was unconstitutional under Sessions v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 7:01 am by Susan Brenner
Babilonia does not preclude its admissibility. . . . [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:54 am
The adherence of ciphers to a generic product has the same effect, since it does not so much confuse the consumer as cause him to associate the one with the other. [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 10:11 am by Heidi Meinzer
Solesky is stayed and does not take effect until the Court takes up the motion to reconsider. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 5:00 am by Josh Blackman
Sessions does not explain why it was unconstitutional. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 4:00 am by Robert Chesney
During the earlier round of argument, there was an unclassified and a classified session, as the government wished to keep secret the identity of the countries to which Doe might be transferred. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 11:27 am
One of the words in the following list does not appear in today's dissent by Judge Kozinski to a Judge Reinhardt immigration opinion. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:59 am by Sabrina I. Pacifici
” WaPo What does the Supreme Court’s NLRB ruling mean for hundreds of labor cases? [read post]