Search for: "Doe v. South Carolina"
Results 81 - 100
of 1,886
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2012, 3:30 am
Of course, this inspired me to turn to South Carolina in my weekly breakdown of the total loss standards across the union.South Carolina does not have a set rule on what constitutes a total loss, presumably leaving it open to a fact question for the jury to determine. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:54 am
Travis Medlock v. [read post]
17 Jul 2013, 3:42 pm
Reeves, 392 S.C. 143, 708 S.E.2d 778 (2011); Doe v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 9:29 am
In Crossman Communities of North Carolina, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 5:47 pm
[Note: For background to this post, please read its predecessor here.]After the Motion to Recuse and Vacate discussed in the previous post, the petition for rehearing heaps on many more reasons why the South Carolina Supreme Court should place no confidence in its divided result in the Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina case. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 5:47 pm
[Note: For background to this post, please read its predecessor here.]After the Motion to Recuse and Vacate discussed in the previous post, the petition for rehearing heaps on many more reasons why the South Carolina Supreme Court should place no confidence in its divided result in the Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina case. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 12:30 pm
The post What Does It Take to Succeed on a Batson Claim in North Carolina? [read post]
3 Apr 2020, 6:34 pm
For the US Supreme Court, the jumbled South Carolina opinions were "ambiguous" and "difficult to discern", but in the South Carolina Circuit Court, just one day later, all was suddenly "clear. [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm
In this column, I briefly describe the facts and arguments of the South Carolina case, Bradacs v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 10:45 am
Anderson, the South Carolina Supreme Court reversed a criminal sexual conduct with a minor conviction because the trial court allowed the forensic examiner of the child to provide expert testimony at trial on “child abuse assessment. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 2:20 am
The South Carolina Supreme Court has ruled that the economic loss rule precludes a truck owner's tort claims against the truck manufacturer. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 4:14 pm
Sections 1051 et seq.), against Bishop Mark Lawrence of the Episcopal Diocese of South Carolina. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 2:02 am
The Court held that "South Carolina does not recognize an independent tort for the negligent spoliation of evidence, third-party or otherwise. [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:21 am
Once again the RIAA has commenced a "John Doe" case targeting North Carolina State University students, this one entitled Arista v. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 7:28 am
[Defendant] has a single, recently hired employee who does not make sales or interact with customers in South Carolina and who maintains no inventory in South Carolina. . . . [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 5:30 am
Smalls v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 10:52 am
Does 1-38, the Raleigh, North Carolina, case targeting 38 North Carolina State University students, District Judge W. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 6:00 am
" So said the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina (quoting Osprey, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 5:55 pm
John Nichols wrote a great article for The South Carolina Lawyer Bulletin for Spring 2008 discussing the admissibility of expert's opinions pursuant to Rule 702, and the lack of necessity for South Carolina to adopt the federal standard described as Daubert for the infamous 1993 decision Daubert v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 5:46 pm
Edwards involved a dispute between a bishop and a member of the clergy, not a dispute between a diocese and the national Church; (2) the case is being remanded to South Carolina State court, where the judges will follow the "neutral principles of law" approach adopted by the South Carolina Supreme Court in All Saints Waccamaw Parish v. [read post]
