Search for: "Doe v. State of Vermont et al" Results 21 - 40 of 80
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2007, 8:10 pm
Today the Connecticut Supreme Court heard arguments from the parties in Kerrigan et al. v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 8:03 am
Rettelle, et al. (06-605).The newly granted case in the Klein case tests whether firms that solicit or accept orders to trade on commodities exchanges -- that is, "futures commission merchants" -- have a right to sue for losses they incur when futures prices are manipulated illegally. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Kent School District, et al.; Kent School District, et al. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 2:45 am by Dennis Crouch
Amgen Inc., et al., No. 15-1039 (Does the notice requirement of the BPCIA create an effective six-month exclusivity post-FDA approval?) [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 8:22 am by Dennis Crouch
Amgen Inc., et al., No. 15-1039 (Does the notice requirement of the BPCIA create an effective six-month exclusivity post-FDA approval?) [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 5:44 am by Kelly Phillips Erb
While the Supreme Court ruling in 2012′s National Federation of Independent Business et al v Sebelius in 2012 (when SCOTUS ruled that ACA was constitutional) allowed states to expand their Medicaid coverage under ACA in exchange for new funds (assuming that they agreed to the terms and conditions), it also gave states an out. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 12:19 pm by Lyle Denniston
IMS Health Inc., et al. (10-779) is an appeal by Vermont state officials seeking to revive a state law that restricted commercial access to and uses of private medical data — here, information about brand-name drugs prescribed by doctors. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 2:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
End of Life Choices New York and the End of Life Liberty Project are applauding the ruling by the New York Court of Appeals to hear the appeal in the case of Myers, et. al. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 9:08 am
Basic Industries, Inc. (15-CA-17525, et al.; 348 NLRB No. 89) Baton Rouge, LA Dec. 18, 2006. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 11:52 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Moore et al., Moore’s Federal Practice—Civil ¶ 101.40[5][a]. [read post]