Search for: "Doe v. United States"
Results 341 - 360
of 43,911
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2024, 11:05 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 9:27 am
Fofana v. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 6:10 am
In relation to the transfer of Russian assets in particular, the United States has been reported as endorsing countermeasures adopted “by states ‘injured’ and ‘specially affected’ by [the Russian] aggression” against Ukraine. [read post]
1 Mar 2024, 3:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:48 pm
In KPMG, LLC v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 11:50 am
In United States v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 8:26 am
United States, in which Donald Trump has been trying to argue that he is immune from prosecution for acts taken while he was President (as Eugene noted here). [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
But there, the analogy with the United States ends. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:59 am
United States, the Supreme Court held that the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA) does not apply to criminal prosecutions. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 4:30 am
Part V reexamines case law that Blackman and Tillman rely on. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:12 am
Last June, the United States Supreme Court held in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:12 am
Last June, the United States Supreme Court held in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 3:12 am
Last June, the United States Supreme Court held in Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 3:07 pm
United States (D. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:06 pm
The other justices united around that view. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
In Pakootas v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:48 am
In 2019, the United States recognized Venezuela’s Interim President Juan Guaidó as the lawful head of state. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 7:46 am
Access Corp. v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 6:36 am
In that same footnote, Justice Stevens also quoted United States v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 4:00 am
These votes seem much more aligned with the Republican Party’s desire to make it harder for people of color to vote than any reasonable interpretation of the United States Constitution.There is an aspect of equal protection clause doctrine that prohibits states from conditioning the exercise of fundamental rights on payments that the poor cannot afford. [read post]