Search for: "Doe v. Watson" Results 1 - 20 of 526
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2017, 9:49 am by William Weinberg
Known as a “Watson Murder” charge, this crime gets its name from a California Supreme Court case, People v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 3:00 am by Zachary Spilman
However, the court’s opinion in Watson does not include some (perhaps) key language found in the court’s opinion in Ballan: “in the context of a specification that was legally sufficient at the time of trial…” Ballan, Slip. op at 15. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 11:43 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Watson does not argue that the testimony on prior use was in fact corroborated, but rather argues that because Thomas’s testimony was not the sole evidence of obviousness, it should not have been excluded. [read post]
14 Feb 2013, 9:09 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Nor does Watson show that the resulting experimentation in this case would be excessive, e.g., that it would involve testing for an unreasonable length of time. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 1:29 pm
So as a condition of supervised release, he's not allowed to go back there (unless he's got a darn good reason and his probation officer agrees).So what does that mean for Watson. [read post]