Search for: "Does 1-97" Results 1 - 20 of 2,126
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2018, 2:02 pm by lcampbell@lawbc.com
Second, the method in PRN 97-2 does not accurately reflect economic incentive to register pesticides. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 9:47 am by Stephen Thorn
  The new law does not go into effect, however, until January 1, 2013. [read post]
10 May 2017, 3:30 am by Barry Sookman
In an important ruling yesterday in Voltage Pictures, LLC v Joe Doe #1 2017 FCA 97, the Federal Court of Appeal ruled that the notice and notice regime established under the CMA changed the law. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 7:19 am by Jonathan J. Russell
The new Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“2017 Tax Cuts Act”) P.L. 115-97, doubled the Estate and Gift tax “Applicable Exclusion Amount,” from $5 million to $10 million, for gifts made, and estates of decedents dying, after December 31, 2017, and before January 1, 2026. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 1:21 pm by Daniel J. Slattery
Although the effective date of Public Act 97-1164 is June 1, 2013, the new law includes a specific statement of legislative intent that the form of mortgage has always been permissive, such that the law should serve to eliminate the prospect of the In re Crane reasoning being available to aggressive bankruptcy trustees seeking to find reasons to avoid Illinois mortgages. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 7:38 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In re Kemps, 97 F.3d 1427, 1430(Fed. [read post]
24 Aug 2022, 5:34 am by Eleonora Rosati
As a result, the court ordered RCS to pay EUR 50,000 in damages.In 2017, the Milan Court of Appeal substantially upheld the decision at first instance, also considering that the notoriety of Rivera (a defence recognized under the already mentioned Article 97 of the Italian Copyright Act) could not be relied upon by RCS when publishing images of him in a private setting.A final appeal of RCS to the Supreme Court followed, only concerning the lawfulness of the unauthorized publication of… [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 8:57 am
The Federal Courts in New York have spoken on this issue particularly in Citigroup v City Holding Co., 97 F Supp 2d 549, 565. [read post]
1 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
Hence, the board concludes that the requirements of R 99(1)(a) are met and thereby follows the jurisprudence established in decisions T 920/97 [1], T 475/07 [1.1] and T 1519/08 [2.1]). [2.2.3] Moreover, the board does not agree that the appeal proceedings should be stayed in view of decision T 445/08, pending as referral G 1/12. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 7:27 am by Finch McCranie, LLP
”[6] Continue reading → The post What is the “trial penalty” in federal criminal cases and does it mean I shouldn’t take my case to trial? [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In this case the opponent filed an appeal against the decision to maintain the opposed patent in amended form.The patent proprietor requested the Board to hold the appeal inadmissible because it was based on fresh documents (D6 to D13).The opponent argued that these documents had been found in a search that had become necessary because the Opposition Division had revised the objective technical problem.[1.1] An appeal shall be rejected as inadmissible if it does not comply with A 106 to A… [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
However, there is no evidence that the service has actually been executed. [1.7.3] The Board does not concur with the intervener on its interpretation of § 167 ZPO. [read post]