Search for: "Does 1 - 107"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,640
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2015, 11:30 am
Establishing a prima facie case of unlawful discrimination and, or, retaliation requires the complaints to set out the "protected activity" alleged to have been violated2015 NY Slip Op 04937, Appellate Division, First DepartmentSupreme Court granted agency’s' motion for summary judgment dismissing the probationary employee’s [Probationer] complaint alleging gender discrimination in violation of the New York City Human Rights Law (Administrative Code of City of NY §… [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 6:13 am
SECTION 107, THIS MATERIAL IS DISTRIBUTED WITHOUT PROFIT TO THOSE WHO HAVE EXPRESSED A PRIOR INTEREST IN RECEIVING THE INCLUDED INFORMATION FOR RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 1:45 pm
(CDAC Network, March 2015) [text]Third Humanitarian Congress, Vienna, 6 March 2015 [info]- These panels focused on ICTs: 1) Social Media: Heaven or Hell? [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
In the decision under appeal it was held that it does, because the subject-matter of claim 1 cannot claim priority from the US application No. 835,799 […]. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 2:08 pm
How many times does that point need to be made? [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 3:02 pm
It relies on the findings of G 1/04 [6.3] and confirms that “whether or not a method is excluded from patentability under A 53(c) cannot depend on the person carrying it out. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
ISBN 978-1-107-09096-5 (hardcover) $143.95. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:57 am
So, what does the Magistrate do? [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 1:29 pm
Hicks, 480 U.S. 321, 325, 107 S. [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 7:55 am
An individual has no reasonable expectation of privacy in the fact that a court has entered a written order commanding his arrest. 725 ILCS 5/107-1 (West 2002). [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 8:21 am
The Court does not accept Plaintiffs' argument. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 9:02 am
SECTION 1-201. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed, without costs, a ruling by Supreme Court which denied the Plaintiff's petition to annul a determination of the City of New York Reasonable Accommodation Appeals Panel [Citywide Panel] denying [1] Plaintiff's request for a reasonable accommodation from the New York City Board of Education's [DOE] COVID-19 vaccine mandate, [2] Plaintiff's motion for limited discovery, and [3] dismissed the proceeding brought… [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division unanimously affirmed, without costs, a ruling by Supreme Court which denied the Plaintiff's petition to annul a determination of the City of New York Reasonable Accommodation Appeals Panel [Citywide Panel] denying [1] Plaintiff's request for a reasonable accommodation from the New York City Board of Education's [DOE] COVID-19 vaccine mandate, [2] Plaintiff's motion for limited discovery, and [3] dismissed the proceeding brought… [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:59 am
ENNIS, Appellee.No. 02-17-00282-CV.Court of Appeals of Texas, Second District, Fort Worth.Delivered: June 28, 2018 Appeal from County Court AT Law NO. 1 of Tarrant County Trial Court NO. 2014-002225-1-A.PANEL: MEIER, PITTMAN, and BIRDWELL, JJ.OPINIONBILL MEIER, Justice.I. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 1:44 pm
§ 107(1). [read post]
16 May 2009, 11:38 am
4.(2) Subrule (1) does not apply to an action transferred to the Superior Court of Justice under section 107 of the Courts of Justice Act. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 8:12 am
” 107 Wn. [read post]
15 May 2008, 11:11 pm
****Frischmann and Lemley [107 Colum. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 4:02 am
Dunn, 480 U.S. 294, 301, fn. 4, 107 S. [read post]
