Search for: "Does 1 - 21"
Results 61 - 80
of 18,412
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jan 2020, 9:46 am
This Fiscal Year (FY) 2020 opportunity will be funded by DOE’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) and supports priorities in: (1) advanced engine and fuel technologies; (2) lightweight materials; (3) new energy efficient mobility systems; and (4) alternative fuels technology demonstrations. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 2:45 am
See generally Taslitz, Does the Cold Nose Know? [read post]
17 May 2008, 6:04 am
Does 1-21 (renamed London-Sire v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 7:06 am
It does not apply, either, to any situation where there is no general emergency. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 3:30 am
Pretend the lawsuits never happened and continue to prepare for December 1. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 11:32 am
The Deputy District Judge agreed with the Tenants and found that the section 21 notice was invalid under section 21A(1) of the Housing Act 1988. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:11 am
The Enlarged Board of Appeal has now issued its long-awaited full decision in case G 1/21. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 2:45 am
Does 1-38 allegedly participated in a single swarm between March 21, 2015 and April 14, 2015. [read post]
25 May 2018, 7:36 am
Bergeson On May 21, 2018, the U.S. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 12:12 pm
The court also found that returning a cheque does not retrospectively validate a section 21 notice. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 11:01 am
§ 812(b)(1), and marijuana does have accepted medical uses. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:58 pm
ii) What is s.13 of the 1977 Act for, and how does it work? [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 8:45 am
The post Petitions to watch | Conference of April 21 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 12:03 am
A series of articles looking at the new rules regarding section 21 notices – applicable in England only – for tenancies created after 1 October 2015. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:03 am
Please call today 1-855-9-ATL-DUI. [read post]
8 Jun 2020, 1:20 pm
Penal Law § 220.31, does not qualify as a “prior conviction for a felony drug offense” for purposes of the recidivism enhancement in 21 U.S.C. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 7:03 am
The Third Circuit does not have to decide the standard of appellate review of denial of a Franks hearing. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 10:26 am
Does 1-21, where a student moved to vacate the ex parte order granting discovery, and to quash the subpoena issued under it, the RIAA has filed its opposition to the motion.Memorandum of Law in Oppposition** Document published online at Internet Law & RegulationCommentary & discussion:[]--> Slashdot It! [read post]
30 May 2018, 3:09 am
The story would sound absurd, and, indeed, does, if you read it without understanding how and why it happens. [read post]
