Search for: "Does 1 - 84"
Results 41 - 60
of 2,405
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2020, 10:35 am
Remember there are two ways to calculate average monthly wage: 1) 84 days wage history, and 2) an one-year’s wage history. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 3:58 pm
ii) What is s.13 of the 1977 Act for, and how does it work? [read post]
13 Jan 2022, 3:31 am
I counted 92 refusals, of which 84 were affirmed and 8 reversed. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 11:21 pm
As part of the Commission’s four-yearly review of modern awards[1], the Full Bench of the Fair Work Commission (FWC) recently handed down a number of decisions[2] which have the effect of inserting a model casual conversion clause (Model Clause) into 84 Modern Awards[3] from 1 October 2018. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:22 am
Cir. 2004); and In re Lowry, 32 F.3d 1579, 1583-84 (Fed. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
The present appeal was filed after the Examining Division (ED) had refused an application because its subject-matter did not comply with the requirements of A 52(4), A 84, A 123(2), A 56 or A 56.In two communications dated December 21, 2004 and April 3, 2006, the ED had held that independent claims 1 and 17 did not comply with A 84 and A 123(2). [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 2:10 am
The Board does, unfortunately, not discuss other case law that does give (or at least seems to give) a meaning to the term "closest", e.g., by using terminology such as "most promising" springboard (see e.g. [read post]
1 Apr 2008, 2:07 am
United States, 308 U.S. 338, 84 L. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
Because of this lack of legal security claim 1 does not comply with the requirement of clarity pursuant to A 84. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
For example, A 101(3) would not justify objections to be based upon A 84, if such objections did not arise out of the amendments made (see T 301/87 [headnote 1; 3.7]). [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 2:53 pm
But, that analysis skips past General Rule of Interpretation 1. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 10:25 pm
Runion, 992 S.W.2d 1, 6 (Tex. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:22 am
There is no federal limit (84%) c. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 4:29 am
Take Adam & Eve for example: what does it tell you about a law firm? [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
However, as also affirmed in said decision G 1/03 [3] and in decision G 1/07 [point 2b of the order], all the requirements of the EPC have to be considered when examining said disclaimer, in particular those of A 84.The fact that the wording chosen for the disclaimer is the same as the one used in decision G 1/07 for describing a surgical method does not mean that the claim fulfils the clarity requirements of A 84.In… [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 7:14 am
The Board concluded “The decision under appeal does not identify specific features of then claim 1 which were considered, individually or in combination, to go beyond the application as originally filed. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:31 pm
In examining the language of the Act the court stressed that when the relevant sections are read conjunctively, ss. 84(2)(g) and 85 (1) (f) provide only that the increase in value of the spouse’s beneficial interest in property held in a discretionary trust is family property. [read post]
6 Jul 2021, 8:20 am
Remember there are two ways to calculate average monthly wage: 1) 84 days wage history, and 2) an one-year’s wage history. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 11:33 am
“Simply put, Executive does not have enough assets to meet all its obligations,” said Benjamin Lawsky, New York’s Superintendent of Financial Services. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 6:36 am
Furthermore, the appellant had, when withdrawing its appeal against the interlocutory decision on 26 April 2017, expressly reconfirmed its request for continuation of the opposition proceedings and clearly stated that the withdrawal does not affect the request for continuation pursuant to Rule 84(1) EPC. [read post]
