Search for: "Does 1-34"
Results 81 - 100
of 5,586
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2012, 3:02 pm
§ 34-23A- 10.1(1)(e)(ii). [read post]
20 May 2019, 6:53 pm
While audi alterem partem principle is of great importance, it falls is already covered in Section 34(2)(a)(iii) and therefore does not fall within the scope of fundamental policy of Indian law. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 10:00 pm
The newest patent has a priority date of April 1, 2005 and was granted December 8, 2009. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 2:22 pm
Does production of TIFFs and load files deprive the receiving party of proper discovery of meta data? [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 4:29 am
C-34 (Competition Act) does not apply to upstream agreements (that is, agreements between competitors in relation to the purchase of a product or service). [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 5:24 am
” 34 C.F.R. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 4:12 am
It does beg the question: does Governor Snyder hate motorcycle owners? [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 5:00 am
The release is No. 34-86073. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 2:06 pm
According to the relevant link at weather.com, the average mean daily temperature in New York City declines from 34 degrees to 33 on January 1. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 11:25 am
The judge dropped all of the 34 lawsuits given out in August except for one, noting that lawsuit as one individual lawsuit.But that lawsuit, labeled Doe No. 2, cannot be found by the ResNet. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 10:29 am
In a case regarding a claimant seeking workers' compensation benefits solely on the basis of a "psychological injury", the GA Supreme Court held that the General Assembly never intended the definition of "injury" in OCGA § 34-9-1(4) to include compensation for purely a "psychological injury." [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 9:43 pm
(e) In no circumstances can the Supreme Court be "court" for the purposes of Section 2(1)(e), and whether the Supreme Court does or does not retain seisin after appointing an Arbitrator, applications will follow the first application made before either a High Court having original jurisdiction in the State or a Principal Civil court having original jurisdiction in the district as the case may be. [read post]
16 Dec 2018, 10:06 am
In these circumstances, I consider that Paragraphs 87f(1) and 87g(4) of the UrhG amount to a technical regulation within the meaning of Article 1(11) of Directive 98/34.The AG also noted that, while copyright protection falls within the scope of Article 17(2) of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and EU legislation (including the Enforcement Directive) seeks to establish a 'high level of protection', this is not absolute. [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 5:11 am
"The Appellate Court stated:Although N.J.S.A. 34:15–54 does not expressly create an exception to the oneyearrequirement for filing a motion for reinstatement, our courts have recognizedthat compensation judges possess the inherent power to excuse the one-year timebar upon the grounds set forth in Rule 4:50–1. [read post]
15 Mar 2019, 9:47 am
Novelty (Article 100(a) and Article 54(1) EPC)Document (1) does not provide a direct and unambiguous disclosure of the feature of intramuscular injection and is thus not novelty-destroying for the subject-matter of claim 1.(...)5. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 7:19 am
Sign Goods/services Remarks VA 2014 00460 Classes 21 and 34. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 1:33 pm
Therefore, we conclude that claim 1’s mere call for sensing and processing static and dynamic acceleration information using generic components does not transform the nature of claim 1 into patent eligible subject matter. [read post]
17 Apr 2011, 3:45 pm
But does the standard of patent validity actually matter? [read post]
28 Feb 2013, 3:02 am
The fact that the parties cannot agree at the outset does not of itself justify the grant or continuation of public funding. [read post]
27 Sep 2021, 12:34 am
The floor amendments of June 3, 2021, were: (1) exclude from the definition of employer any contractor as that term is defined in section 3 of P.L.1999, c.238 (C.34:11-56.50); and (2) provide that the bill does not apply to athletes employed by professional sports teams. [read post]
