Search for: "Does 1-59" Results 101 - 120 of 2,989
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2010, 8:15 pm by Chad Marriott
  The DOE is seeking applications in two topic areas: (1) MHK Technologies Concept Development (TRLs 1-3) and (2) MHK Technology Readiness Level Advancement (TRLs 4-9). [read post]
14 Nov 2022, 11:49 pm by Eleonora Rosati
Among other things, that such registrations would have been made in bad faith in accordance with Article 59(1)(b) EUTMR. [read post]
9 Aug 2020, 6:00 am by Charles (Chuck) Rubin
The PLR concludes that this provision does not apply where the grantor is a natural person. [read post]
9 Jul 2021, 3:05 am by Léon Dijkman
According to the Constitutional Court, the complaint did not explain how this violated the right to self-governance (at 59). [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 8:24 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Alberta (aff’d ABCA; leave to appeal to SCC refused) as justified under s. 1 [56] The objective of the age requirement is similarly clear if one considers that, in the absence of an age requirement, babies meeting the citizenship and residency requirements would be eligible to vote. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 5:45 am by Nicholas J. Wagoner
Forum for Academic & Institutional Rights, Inc., 547 U.S. 47, 59, 126 S. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 6:48 am by Eleonora Rosati
As a result, it concluded that the trade mark should be declared invalid under Article 59(1)(b). [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 6:44 am by Elizabeth Williams
Privilege does not apply if the client impliedly or expressly has waived it. [read post]
8 Jul 2016, 6:44 am by Elizabeth Williams
Privilege does not apply if the client impliedly or expressly has waived it. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 8:53 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
” Cross-Appellant’s Br. 59(alterations in original) (quoting J.A. 2269). [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 10:22 am by Eugene Volokh
So actually only 1% of the respondents had used physical force or threat of physical force to get sex. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 10:47 am by Glenn R. Reiser
Rul. 59-60, 1959-1 C.B. 237, § 4.01).Generally, in determining fair value, the judge should consider “‘proof of value by any techniques or methods which are generally acceptable in  the financial community and otherwise admissible in court. [read post]