Search for: "Does 1-84"
Results 21 - 40
of 2,368
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2016, 8:20 am
Hamdan, 548 U.S. at 572-84. [read post]
27 Aug 2017, 3:10 pm
Frederik Dhondt (Vrije Universiteit Brussel) has published Recent Research in the History of International Law
(Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis, Vol. 84, nos. 1-2, pp. 313–334, 2016). [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 1:38 am
The Board carefully assessed the applicability of Art. 84 EPC as well as of Rule 42(1)(c) and Rule 48(1)(c) EPC as possible legal basis requiring adaptation of the description, and concluded that such basis does not exist (except possible in the case of non-unity). [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 9:34 am
In the month of November 2010, 84 opinions and orders were issued by the courts. [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 11:21 pm
As part of the Commission’s four-yearly review of modern awards[1], the Full Bench of the Fair Work Commission (FWC) recently handed down a number of decisions[2] which have the effect of inserting a model casual conversion clause (Model Clause) into 84 Modern Awards[3] from 1 October 2018. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 7:22 am
Cir. 2004); and In re Lowry, 32 F.3d 1579, 1583-84 (Fed. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 2:10 am
The Board does, unfortunately, not discuss other case law that does give (or at least seems to give) a meaning to the term "closest", e.g., by using terminology such as "most promising" springboard (see e.g. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
Because of this lack of legal security claim 1 does not comply with the requirement of clarity pursuant to A 84. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 5:01 pm
For example, A 101(3) would not justify objections to be based upon A 84, if such objections did not arise out of the amendments made (see T 301/87 [headnote 1; 3.7]). [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 2:53 pm
But, that analysis skips past General Rule of Interpretation 1. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 10:25 pm
Runion, 992 S.W.2d 1, 6 (Tex. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:22 am
There is no federal limit (84%) c. [read post]
16 Aug 2013, 4:29 am
Take Adam & Eve for example: what does it tell you about a law firm? [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
However, as also affirmed in said decision G 1/03 [3] and in decision G 1/07 [point 2b of the order], all the requirements of the EPC have to be considered when examining said disclaimer, in particular those of A 84.The fact that the wording chosen for the disclaimer is the same as the one used in decision G 1/07 for describing a surgical method does not mean that the claim fulfils the clarity requirements of A 84.In… [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 11:05 am
Judge Posner's opinion notes that "[t]he minimum guidelines sentence for a bank robbery that does not involve the use of a gun is 46 months, and when the consecutive 84-month sentence required by section 924(c)(1) is tacked on to the minimum guidelines sentence, the total is 130 months. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 7:14 am
The Board concluded “The decision under appeal does not identify specific features of then claim 1 which were considered, individually or in combination, to go beyond the application as originally filed. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 1:31 pm
In examining the language of the Act the court stressed that when the relevant sections are read conjunctively, ss. 84(2)(g) and 85 (1) (f) provide only that the increase in value of the spouse’s beneficial interest in property held in a discretionary trust is family property. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 6:36 am
Furthermore, the appellant had, when withdrawing its appeal against the interlocutory decision on 26 April 2017, expressly reconfirmed its request for continuation of the opposition proceedings and clearly stated that the withdrawal does not affect the request for continuation pursuant to Rule 84(1) EPC. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 1:36 am
The Board does however not address the Guidelines, although that could have been expected in view of Art. 20(2) RPBA2020. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 5:36 pm
(Section 524(a)(1) of the Bankruptcy Code.) [read post]
