Search for: "Does 1-87" Results 21 - 40 of 2,081
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2019, 12:57 pm
This Boards of Appeal (3.2.08) decision reasoned that Article 87(1) EPC does not prevent an applicant for a first application (P1) sharing their right to priority with a co-applicant for a subsequent application (A1) claiming priority from P1 (r. 2.4). [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Conceding that Public Officers Law §87(2)(a) does permit the custodian of records sought pursuant to FOIL to deny access to records if they "are specifically exempted from disclosure by state or federal statute," the Appellate Division opined out that "no federal statute exists prohibiting [the custodians] from releasing [the] requested documents. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Conceding that Public Officers Law §87(2)(a) does permit the custodian of records sought pursuant to FOIL to deny access to records if they "are specifically exempted from disclosure by state or federal statute," the Appellate Division opined out that "no federal statute exists prohibiting [the custodians] from releasing [the] requested documents. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Conceding that Public Officers Law §87(2)(a) does permit the custodian of records sought pursuant to FOIL to deny access to records if they "are specifically exempted from disclosure by state or federal statute," the Appellate Division opined out that "no federal statute exists prohibiting [the custodians] from releasing [the] requested documents. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Conceding that Public Officers Law §87(2)(a) does permit the custodian of records sought pursuant to FOIL to deny access to records if they "are specifically exempted from disclosure by state or federal statute," the Appellate Division opined out that "no federal statute exists prohibiting [the custodians] from releasing [the] requested documents. [read post]
17 Mar 2015, 2:11 pm by Patti Waller
On November 27, 2007,[1] a health department officer in central Massachusetts contacted the Massachusetts Department of Public Health (MDPH) to report a Listeria infection in an 87-year-old man, later identified as John Powers. [read post]
9 Oct 2012, 12:24 pm by Judy Kwan
With its October 1 filing of what could be a $87 billion lawsuit against Bear Stearns successor J.P, Morgan—as well as not-so-subtle hints of more lawsuits to come—the RMBS Working Group made its presence felt with a bang, not a whimper. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 8:24 pm
Co. (204 AD3d 525 [1st Dept 2022]) , citing Bentoria, AFFIRMED Supreme Court's order granting the insurer's pre-answer CPLR 3211(a)(1) motion to dismiss the complaint based on documentary evidence, holding:The documentary evidence conclusively establishes a defense to plaintiff's claims (CPLR 3211[a][1]; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 87-88 [1994]). [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 12:20 pm by Chamlin, Rosen, Uliano & Witherington
Stein, Closing Arguments 2d, Sec 1:87 - If the disposition of the sentence is for the court, and the jury has no concern in meting out punishment, discussion of that matter is not proper during argument. [read post]
31 May 2013, 4:00 am
Public Officers Law §87(2)(a) permits an agency to deny access to public records that "are specifically exempted from disclosure by state or federal statute. [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 2:00 am by Rose Hughes
  Does the EPC confer jurisdiction on the EPO to determine whether a party validly claims to be a successor in title as referred to in Article 87(1)(b) EPC? [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 3:10 pm
On April 30, 2009, the NYPD submitted those documents for an in camera inspection pursuant to the Court's Order and Decision filed on April 1, 2009. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
In this opposition appeal case, claim 1 before the Board read:1. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 7:55 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
from Ex parte HASHIMOTOThe Examiner finds that the combination of Kanefuji and Kroyerdiscloses many of the elements of claim 1, but does not disclose securing acore to an upper mold. [read post]
12 Apr 2017, 6:00 am by EEM
"The Short-term Impacts of Development-induced Displacement on Wealth and Subjective Well-being in the Brazilian Amazon," World Development, vol. 87 (Nov. 2016) [postprint]Urban Land Acquisition and Involuntary Resettlement: Linking Innovation and Local Benefits (World Bank, Feb. 2017) [text]What Does Development-based Displacement Look Like in Africa? [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
P1 and P2, respectively, contain partial BRCA2 sequences while P3 does not contain any coding sequence at all. [read post]