Search for: "Does v. Advanced Textile Corp."
Results 1 - 20
of 27
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2024, 12:55 pm
See Cuno Engineering Corp. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
See, e.g., Advanced Textile, 214 F.3d at 1072 (nonresident foreign worker); Doe v. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 3:42 pm
Advanced Textile Corp. (9th Cir. 2000) (allowing anonymity where textile-worker-plaintiffs presented significant evidence of retaliation by blacklisting and legitimately "fear[ed] extraordinary retaliation, such as deportation, arrest, and imprisonment"); cf Doe v. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 12:08 pm
Amalgamated Clothing & Textile Workers Union v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
While we may help them refine their vocabulary and advance their thinking, the discontent being conveyed is theirs, not ours. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:44 am
[22] Likewise, in a lawsuit over an allegedly false credit report—basically, a narrow statutory quasi-libel claim—the court allowed plaintiff to proceed as a Doe, because "Publicly identifying Plaintiff risks impeding her future employment prospects by making the improperly disclosed information public knowledge. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:52 am
Plaintiff retorts that this argument "just does not make sense" because the witnesses are medical professionals—or medical students—who often use the name "Jane Doe" to refer to unidentified female patients. [read post]
7 May 2021, 12:05 pm
Advanced Textile Corp. (9th Cir. 2000). [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 5:01 am
Advanced Textile Corp. (9th Cir. 2000), to assert economic harm is a ground for anonymity. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:59 pm
Advanced Textile Corp., 214 F.3d 1058 (9th Cir. 2000); see also Sealed Plaintiff v. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 5:38 pm
Advanced Textile Corp. (9th Cir. 2000) ("We recognize that the balance between a party's need for anonymity and the interests weighing in favor of open judicial proceedings may change as the litigation progresses. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 9:22 pm
A little more than five years ago, in a case called Entergy Corp. v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 8:26 am
Unless it does, we can expect them to walk away from it as much as they can. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
See Zerbst v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 9:45 am
Sunspool Corp., 714 F.2d 1573, 1580 (Fed. [read post]
11 May 2012, 12:18 pm
Advanced Textile Corp., 214 F.3d 1058, 1068 (9th Cir.2000). [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 10:22 am
Advanced Textile Corp., 214 F.3d 1058, 1068 (9th Cir.2000). [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:20 pm
Advanced Textile Corp., 214 F.3d 1058, 1067 (9th Cir. 2000). [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 7:00 am
Advanced Textile Corp. ., 214 F.3d 1058, 1072 (9th Cir.2000). [read post]
