Search for: "Doll v. Doll" Results 81 - 100 of 678
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Aug 2019, 3:29 am
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Tee-Tee-Ā-Bee) has scheduled five (V) oral hearings for the month of September 2019. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 10:00 am
The phrase was used in 1964 by United States Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart to describe his threshold test for obscenity in Jacobellis v. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 7:53 am by Josh H. Escovedo
United Trademark Holdings, Inc. filed for registration of the mark RAPUNZEL for use in conjunction with dolls and toy figures. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:25 am
No]"OUR LAWYERS ARE DOCTORS" Fails to Function as a Service Mark, Says TTABMisuse of ® Symbol: TTAB Dismisses SUPERCORE Opposition: No Likelihood of Confusion with U-CORE and No Intent to Deceive in Misuse of the “R” SymbolStanding: Ordinary Consumer Has Standing to Oppose RAPUNZEL for Dolls, Says TTABDoes a Law School Professor Have Standing to Oppose RAPUNZEL for Dolls and Toy Figures? [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 7:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
Across the river in Pest, the many beautiful pedestrianized streets in the central district are lined with cafes and restaurants, as well as innumerable souvenir shops selling stacking dolls and intricately embroidered lace tablecloths. [read post]
25 Dec 2018, 7:38 am by Kevin LaCroix
Across the river in Pest, the many beautiful pedestrianized streets in the central district are lined with cafes and restaurants, as well as innumerable souvenir shops selling stacking dolls and intricately embroidered lace tablecloths. [read post]
19 Dec 2018, 9:49 am
PatentsKat Neil reflects on the lexical transformation of the “troll” from stock character in Scandinavian mythology (and plastic dolls with bright colored up-combed hair...) into a staple of contemporary IP discourse, not once but twice: The IP term (thus far) of the millennium: the curious story of the adoption of "patent troll" and "internet trolling"Kat Troll DollIPKat provided further depth commentary on Warner-Lambert v Actavis, delving… [read post]
12 Dec 2018, 6:35 am by scanner1
Doll DA 18-0123 2018 MT 300 Civil – Water Rights Adjudication Rosendale v. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:10 pm by Schachtman
“Then time will tell just who fellAnd who’s been left behind”                   Dylan, “Most Likely You Go Your Way” (1966)   When the Daubert case headed to the Supreme Court, it had 22 amicus briefs in tow. [read post]