Search for: "Donald Eastman v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 37
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jun 2016, 3:07 pm
Professor John Eastman and I had some fun on PublicSquare.net debating the merits of the issues before the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 5:01 am
Notably, Eastman filed the complaint in Trump v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 12:28 pm
It is no exaggeration to say that the history of the United States has never seen an account of a president’s conduct quite so devastating as the first nine pages of Judge David Carter’s opinion of March 28 in Eastman v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 8:43 am
The claims were made in the select committee’s brief in Eastman v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:42 am
Perhaps by rushing the United States Capitol to seize control and prevent it from complying with the Constitution and rulings of the Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 9:12 pm
The Amendment’s text reads:All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.This powerful piece of constitutional text has ensured for 150 years that whatever else happens to people at the bottom rungs of American society, whose own legal status in our polity may be doubtful, their children, at least, are full legal citizens of the… [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 4:19 pm
The expert near-consensus on this subject is backed by longstanding Supreme Court precedent, going back to United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 3:41 pm
Professor John Eastman has filed briefs on behalf of Donald Trump, seeking to intervene in the case and endorsing the call to enjoin the defendant states from appointing electors in accordance with their certified election results. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 8:36 am
Khary Penebaker et al v. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
Quinta Jurecic analyzed the California State Bar’s recent disciplinary action against attorney and Trump ally John Eastman. [read post]
2 Nov 2018, 5:48 am
”In the famous Slaughter-House cases of 1872, the Supreme Court stated that this qualifying phrase was intended to exclude “children of ministers, consuls, and citizens or subjects of foreign States born within the United States. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
Waterfront Comm'n (1964) and Kastigar v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:31 am
§ 371, which prohibits conspiracies to defraud the United States in the administration of elections. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 5:10 am
Stuart Gerson, former Acting Attorney General of the United States, Assistant Attorney General, and an Assistant United States Attorney: The signal value of the Select Committee so far at least is its disclosure of evidence that utterly negates any defense that Donald Trump or his closest advisers somehow lacked intent with respect to their actions as to the January 6 insurrection. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 3:13 pm
United States. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 12:28 pm
In Ziglar v. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 5:34 am
The president has “plenary and exclusive power … as the sole organ of the federal government in the field of international relations,” the Supreme Court noted more than 80 years ago in the case of United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 12:32 pm
Volokh also wrote that the Supreme Court’s United States v. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 3:46 am
In the 2012 United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 9:05 pm
But in a series of decisions, culminating in Kelly v. [read post]
