Search for: "Donaldson v. Donaldson" Results 41 - 60 of 293
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2020, 12:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
 This is very similar to a 1992 California case (Donaldson v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 5:49 am by Riana Harvey
Further case law has also illustrated that the attractiveness of a design, the intentions of the author, the design’s visual effect, symbolism and commercial success in the marketplace will not be factors in a finding of eligibility for copyright protection (Bleistein v Donaldson Lithographing Co).In relation to derivative works, it is stated that the registration of such works would not cover any previously published or registered works (17 U.S.C. [read post]
15 May 2020, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
For example, in 1533 King James V issued a decree banning gypsies from Scotland saying they should ‘depart forth of this realme with their wifis, bairns and companies. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
He is suing the BBC, claiming it defamed him when it falsely alleged he had sanctioned the killing of former Sinn Féin official Denis Donaldson who worked for decades as a spy for the British. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:04 pm
Justice Myers summarized the law:[157]   In Elder Advocates of Alberta Society v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 11:27 am by Margaret Taylor
The first type—an assertion of presidential communications privilege—represents the core of executive privilege that was first recognized in U.S. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2019, 8:54 am by Jonathan Shaub
Every oversight action pending in the House that involves a former official—including, for example, the Judiciary Committee’s past subpoenas to Hicks and Annie Donaldson, former deputy counsel, as well as its recent subpoena to former White House official Rick Dearborn—could potentially be reset to a new default. [read post]
13 Jul 2019, 7:04 am by Vishnu Kannan
She also shared Ann Donaldson’s written responses to questions from the House Judiciary Committee. [read post]
22 May 2019, 8:14 am by Sarah Grant
The second covers the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Pepper v. [read post]