Search for: "Douglas B. Powell" Results 1 - 20 of 49
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2024, 3:39 pm by Guest Author
Our constitutional order contains an “anti-power-accumulation principle. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 6:11 am by Dan Bressler
” “A classic example of this is when Lawyer A makes a legal argument before an appellate court on behalf of Client A that is inconsistent with how Lawyer A’s colleague at their firm, Lawyer B, is arguing for another firm client, Client B, in a separate matter at a trial court that is bound by that appellate court’s decisions. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am by INFORRM
Government Tweets, Government Speech: The First Amendment Implications of Government Trolling, Seattle University Law Review, Vol. 44, No. 69, 2020, Douglas B. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
The following is a series of questions posed by Ronald Collins to Geoffrey Stone and David Strauss in connection with their new book, “Democracy and Equality: The Enduring Constitutional Vision of the Warren Court” (Oxford University Press, 2020). [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am by Gustavo Arballo
Supp. 1217, es parcialmente confirmado y parcialmente revocado.BLACKMUN, J., emitió la opinión de la Corte, en la que se unieron BURGER, CJ, y DOUGLAS, BRENNAN, STEWART, MARSHALL y POWELL, JJ. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 1:34 pm by Josh Blackman
” On appeal, only Justices Douglas, Marshall, and Brennan would accept this argument. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 1:18 pm by Adam Gillette
Douglas, William Brennan, Potter Stewart, Thurgood Marshall, Harry Blackmun, and Lewis Powell. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 1:44 pm by Gustavo Arballo
Clarito y sin eufemismos, reconoce pragmáticamente que hay un sacrificio de derechos y explica cuál es la razón pragmática. aunque hay otros mecanismos de responsabilidad de los jueces, como su remoción, Powell está pensando básicamente en las apelaciones. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 9:21 am
  Turner counterclaimed for revocation of Powell's CTM trade mark on the ground that it was applied for in bad faith contrary to Article 52(1)(b) of Council Regulation 207/2009 . [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
Douglas 13-191Issue: Whether the Due Process Clause is violated by the Florida Supreme Court’s new rule of preclusion, which permits Engle v. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
1 Apr 2013, 10:24 pm by Dan Flynn
” On April 1st, Food Safety News also contacted Jeffery B. [read post]