Search for: "Douglas v. Harris"
Results 1 - 20
of 301
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2012, 3:00 am
Douglas Harris (British Columbia) has posted A Railway, a City, and the Public Regulation of Private Property: CPR v. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 11:48 pm
Harris (UBC Faculty of Law) has posted A Railway, a City, and the Public Regulation of Private Property: CPR v. [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 4:28 am
State v. [read post]
8 Feb 2013, 11:59 am
Here is our write-up for the webinar: In Harris v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 12:00 pm
Here is the abstract: Justice Harry A, Blackmun (LC)Let me begin with one sentence that Justice Harry A. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 8:00 am
Today at noon, David deRubertis and Paul Cane will join me for a discussion of Harris v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
Harris. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 5:26 pm
Harris, Esq. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:09 pm
SEIU, and today in Harris v. [read post]
1 Apr 2014, 7:27 am
EOG, now pending in district court in Harris County. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 6:00 am
The case went to trial prior to the California Supreme Court's decision in Harris v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 6:00 am
The case went to trial prior to the California Supreme Court's decision in Harris v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 9:30 pm
Harris, UBC Faculty of Law, has posted A Railway, a City, and the Public Regulation of Private Property: CPR v. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 11:26 am
By Eric Goldman Harris v. [read post]
12 Jul 2013, 12:06 pm
Douglas, Williams & Connolly [read post]
20 May 2017, 3:00 am
Supreme Court decision provides some clarification concerning the legal standard applicable to students with a disability receiving an appropriate public education Source: New York Municipalities Blog, Harris Beach, PLLCOn March 22, 2017, in Endrew F. v. [read post]
31 Dec 2007, 11:46 am
State of Indiana Lloyd Harris v. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 9:58 am
Trent Harris, Sr. v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 4:49 pm
Burwell. 6:51 p.m.: Douglas Berman analyzed today’s opinion in Molina-Martinez v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 2:53 pm
The Court, in Jones v. [read post]
