Search for: "Dow Agrosciences LLC" Results 61 - 77 of 77
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2012, 3:23 pm by Bexis
Today’s post is of the “this and that” variety ? [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 9:03 am
It got hardly any attention in the blawgosphere at the time - aside from us, 360, and the hardcore Supreme Court junkies over at SCOTUSBlog (and even they buried it in the middle of a routine post) - but earlier this month the Supreme Court indicated interest in the certiorari petition from the Farm Raised Salmon case. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
December 14, 2009 – A summary review of environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
1 Nov 2007, 1:32 pm
Dow Agrosciences LLC, 544 U.S. 431 (2005), isn't relevant since EPA in Bates wasn't purporting to evaluate substantively the manufacturer's statements.Finally, Medtronic closes strong, with policy reasons supporting preemption. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 11:50 am
Dow Agrosciences LLC, 544 U.S. 431 (2005), as creating an irrebuttable presumption against preemption that overrode congressional intent:The Court of Appeals viewed Bates as having drastically changed this traditional preemption analysis, so as to make the presumption against preemption irrebuttable and to require examination of the statutory language alone. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 8:29 am
Fish.Well, not exactly.In reading and actually thinking about yesterdays Farm Raised Salmon decision from the California Supreme Court, the operative four-letter word is "food. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:31 pm
Dow Agrosciences LLC, 544 U.S. 431 (2005):In undertaking a pre-emption analysis. . ., a court should bear in mind the concept of equivalence. [read post]
26 Jul 2007, 11:18 am
Dow Agrosciences LLC, 544 U.S. 431, (2005), Ferrari held that the good old "presumption against preemption" trumped congressional intent. 2007 WL 1933129, at *4. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm by Bexis
In the last month, we’ve seen two more appellate decisions definitively rejecting the idea of some sort of separate cause of action – apart from warning or design defect – for “failure to test,” whatever that might be. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:55 pm by Bexis
Dow Agrosciences LLC, 544 U.S. 431 (2005), a non-FDCA case involving violation claims under a different statute. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
A little more than a year ago, back in February 2008, a majority of the Supreme Court stated, in Riegel v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 11:08 am by Bexis
Everybody knows we’re interested in prescription drug preemption. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm by Bexis
We’re always open to flattery, and it’s flattering to us when somebody thinks that we provide the best legal research available (at least without a prescription). [read post]