Search for: "Dow Chemical Co. v. United States" Results 41 - 60 of 105
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Mar 2011, 9:15 am by Schachtman
Dow Chemical Co., 484 U.S. 1004  (1988); see also In re “Agent Orange” Prod. [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 8:15 am by Sean Wajert
But a plurality rejected the "stream of commerce" concept in Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2017, 2:18 pm by Schachtman
About three percent of all live births in the United States have a major malformation. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
June. 13, 2013), holding essentially that, since those meanies on the United States Supreme Court aren’t letting plaintiffs sue generic manufacturers, we’ll change Alabama common law and let them sue someone else. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:40 am by Dennis Crouch
Petitions for Writ of Certiorari Denied or Dismissed: The Dow Chemical Company v. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
United States, 17 F.3d 890, 901 (6th Cir. 1994); Albrecht v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm by admin
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved  Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under… [read post]
23 May 2008, 10:17 pm
Cir. 1984), which awarded children surviving a plane crash medical monitoring to diagnose future impact-related injuries, and the state’s Doe v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 12:06 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), General Electric Co. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 10:48 am
United States, 293 F. 1013 (DC Cir. 1923). [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm by admin
In the United States, federal agencies such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and their state analogues, regularly set exposure standards that could not and should not hold up in a common-law tort case. [read post]