Search for: "Doyle v. Superior Court" Results 1 - 20 of 44
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2022, 7:57 am by Karen Gullo
Lagleva, and Tara Evans filed the suit in Marin County Superior Court on Oct. 14, 2021, seeking to end the sheriff’s ALPR data-sharing practices. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 11:18 pm by Jordan Bierkos
The Queen in Right of Canada, [1982] 2 S.C.R. 643, Doyle Construction Co. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:05 pm by Thomas G. Heintzman
Court’s Decision A single judge of the Ontario Superior Court set aside the arbitrator’s award for the following reasons: The cases, and in particular the decision of the British Columbia Court of Appeal in Doyle Construction Co. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 8:40 am
Lavin as associate justice of the Second District Court of Appeal, Division Three.Lavin, 56, of Los Angeles, has served as a judge at the Los Angeles County Superior Court since 2001. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 10:53 am
For publication opinions today (1): In Baker Machinery, Inc. v Superior Canopy Corp., et. al., a 14-page opinion, Judge Friedlander concludes:In dismissing Baker's case, the trial court considered the factors identified in Lee v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 2:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins, Esq.
Williamson of the Monroe County Common Pleas Court confirmed in the case of Farina v. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 6:11 am by Dan Bressler
” “Dew told the court he was unaware of Doyle’s racism and Facebook posts until 2021, court records show. [read post]
21 Jan 2011, 9:25 am by Kali Borkoski
Superior Court yesterday for jury duty. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:50 am by Thomas G. Heintzman
Appeal Judge’s Decision Ellis-Don appealed the arbitrator’s decision to the Ontario Superior Court of Justice. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 10:09 am by Karen Gullo
Lagleva, and Tara Evans, long-time Marin community members, in a lawsuit filed in Marin County Superior Court. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
Wrote the court: [T]he petitioner failed to state a cause of action for judicial dissolution of the LLC pursuant to Limited Liability Company Law § 702 based on his allegations of oppressive conduct and the respondent’s efforts to exclude him from the management of the LLC (see Doyle v Icon, LLC, 103 AD3d 440). [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
Wrote the court: [T]he petitioner failed to state a cause of action for judicial dissolution of the LLC pursuant to Limited Liability Company Law § 702 based on his allegations of oppressive conduct and the respondent’s efforts to exclude him from the management of the LLC (see Doyle v Icon, LLC, 103 AD3d 440). [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 3:28 am by Peter Mahler
Wrote the court: [T]he petitioner failed to state a cause of action for judicial dissolution of the LLC pursuant to Limited Liability Company Law § 702 based on his allegations of oppressive conduct and the respondent’s efforts to exclude him from the management of the LLC (see Doyle v Icon, LLC, 103 AD3d 440). [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 1:52 pm
The Henderson v Henderson rule did not apply for two reasons. [read post]