Search for: "Draft v. Lay et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 74
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2022, 7:08 am
Pix Credit hereWhile interest in this case, HKSAR v Lai Man Ling [2022] 4 HKC 410, [2022] HKDC 355, reported in September 2022, may be diminishing, its relevance requires sustained examination. [read post]
12 Apr 2007, 1:33 am
See State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 4:41 pm
The data protection principles were also central to the way in which the much more recent case of GC et. al. v CNIL assessed the processing of past criminal proceedings. [read post]
2 Apr 2023, 11:52 pm
Source: Baron, J., Arque-Castells, P., Leonard, A., et al., Empirical Assessment of Potential Challenges in SEP Licensing, European Commission, DG GROW, 2023. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 10:44 am
City of Carmel-by-the-Sea, et al. (6th Dist., January 4, 2012) ___ Cal.App.4th ___.) [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 4:04 pm
Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs et al. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 1:17 pm
Tuesday, the Supreme Court will hear one hour of oral argument in McDonald, et al., v. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:00 am
United States of America et al., a case heard in the United States District Court Central District of California by Judge Virginia A. [read post]
15 Oct 2010, 8:00 am
United States of America et al., a case heard in the United States District Court Central District of California by Judge Virginia A. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 11:43 pm
Wouter PorsEarly on Monday 10 December 2018, the Court of Justice of the European Union issued its judgment in Wightman et al v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union (C-621/18), on whether the UK can unilaterally withdraw its Brexit notification. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 10:01 am
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, et al., a case rich in ironic implications. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 2:35 pm
Rand, et al., 168 F.R.D. 633 (N.D. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 2:32 pm
Sierra Club, et al. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2019, 5:40 am
The order made by Justice Gleeson, in a carefully reasoned decision in Bell Media Inc. et al v GOLDTV.BIZ 2019 FC 1432, ordered certain ISPs in Canada to block access to pirate subscription streaming sites (GoldTV.biz and GoldTV.ca) that were infringing the copyrights of the plaintiffs Bell Media Inc., Groupe TVA Inc, and Rogers media Inc. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 12:46 pm
Khalid Sheikh Mohammad, et al. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 12:27 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 12:35 pm
Khalid Sheikh Mohammed et al. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
THE CITY OF PALO ALTO et al., Defendants and Appellants. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 6:54 pm
“Hypotheses are verified by testing, not by submitting them to lay juries for a vote. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 11:14 am
" This is very similar to the argument by Lemley et al. that § 101 is about claim scope, not gatekeeping.In Part II, Dreyfuss and Evans apply these ideas to patents on genetic diagnostics, which is a subset of what are often called "gene patents," and I will use the "gene patent" shorthand in this post. [read post]
