Search for: "Driscoll v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 125
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Sep 2008, 2:50 pm
The ruling hinged on the "degree of control" exercised by the newspaper over the carrier, with the court finding that the T&G exercised greater control than did the Athol Daily News in a 2003 case in which the Supreme Judicial Court reached the opposite conclusion.The court's opinion: Driscoll v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 2:54 am
Police officer’s September 11 line of duty injury claim rejectedMatter of Teran v Kelly, 2007 NY Slip Op 30009(U), March 1, 2007, Supreme Court, New York County, Docket Number: 0109358, Judge: Marcy S. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
At Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog, Sharon Driscoll discusses the decision with law professor Robert Weisberg. [read post]
7 May 2007, 1:22 am
Click here to go to www.nylj.com APPELLATE DIVISIONTHIRD DEPARTMENTCivil PracticeDiscovery Denial Upheld in State's Suit to Recover Medicaid, EPIC Drug Reimbursement Overpayments Matter of the People of the State of New York, respondent v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
, I analyzed the decision in Driscoll v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
 The "thrust" of the claim for distributions, Justice Driscoll states, "is to vindicate his personal rights as an individual and not as a stockholder on behalf of the corporation in that Plaintiff alleges that Homapour breached an agreement between Homapour and Plaintiff providing for the payment of certain distributions to Plaintiff. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 10:00 pm by Peter Mahler
Shareholder’s Derivative Claims Against Other Owners Fail to Satisfy Demand Futility Pleading Requirements Ditlya v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
 The "thrust" of the claim for distributions, Justice Driscoll states, "is to vindicate his personal rights as an individual and not as a stockholder on behalf of the corporation in that Plaintiff alleges that Homapour breached an agreement between Homapour and Plaintiff providing for the payment of certain distributions to Plaintiff. [read post]