Search for: "DuPont De Nemours, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 133
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2024, 2:26 pm
The behavioral economics field gives us principles that suggest the loss of social security benefits will yield strong emotional and/or litigious responses, with the potential for carry-over into the private pension sphere.[7] To summarize why this is likely to occur: (1) individuals—using the status quo as their reference point—tend to view change as either a gain or a loss from the status quo; (2) “[s]ince losses loom larger [people feel them more… [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:00 pm
Kirby Inland Marine Inc. (5th Cir. 2007) 482 F.3d 347, 351.) [read post]
10 Nov 2023, 8:09 am
DuPont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm
In Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 7:08 am
Three large American chemical companies, The Chemours Company, DuPont de Nemours, Inc., and Corteva, Inc., recently announced a massive $1.185 billion settlement deal over complaints about the emerging toxic chemicals of concern known as Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances, or PFAS as they are more commonly referred to. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 7:08 am
Three large American chemical companies, The Chemours Company, DuPont de Nemours, Inc., and Corteva, Inc., recently announced a massive $1.185 billion settlement deal over complaints about the emerging toxic chemicals of concern known as Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances, or PFAS as they are more commonly referred to. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 7:08 am
Three large American chemical companies, The Chemours Company, DuPont de Nemours, Inc., and Corteva, Inc., recently announced a massive $1.185 billion settlement deal over complaints about the emerging toxic chemicals of concern known as Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances, or PFAS as they are more commonly referred to. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 1:05 pm
DuPont De Nemours & Co., 761 So. 2d 306 (Fla. 2000) (holding that contractual choice-of-law provisions are presumptively valid and enforceable in Florida unless the law of the chosen forum contravenes strong public policy). [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 10:00 am
Dupont De Nemours & Co., 336 F. [read post]
2 Apr 2022, 8:48 am
DuPont De Nemours & Co., 761 So. 2d 306 (Fla. 2000). [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
Risk assessments would seemingly be about assessing risks, but they are not. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 9:00 am
(“Old DuPont”), The Chemours Company (“Chemours”), DuPont de Nemours, Inc (“New DuPont”), and Corteva, Inc. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 8:33 am
DuPont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 8:34 am
DuPont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 2:30 pm
DuPont de Nemours & Co. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 2:03 pm
I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, The Chemours Company, DuPont de Nemours, Inc. and Corteva, Inc. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 5:00 am
I. du Pont de Nemours and Company, The Chemours Company, DuPont de Nemours, Inc. and Corteva, Inc, (the “Companies”), businesses with a long history of operations within the State, today announced a settlement agreement designed to benefit Delaware’s natural resources and the people of the State of Delaware now, and well into the future. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 7:10 pm
Although no rule or statute prohibits side switching, state and federal courts have exercised what they have called an inherent power to supervise and control ethical breaches by lawyers and expert witnesses.[1] The Wang Test Although certainly not the first case on side-switching, the decision of a federal trial court, in Wang Laboratories, Inc. v Toshiba Corp., has become a key precedent on disqualification of expert witnesses.[2] The test spelled out in the Wang case has generally been… [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 5:55 am
”Solvay Specialty Polymers/ArkemaArkema, Inc., of King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, produced chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) refrigerant gases at the Gloucester County site in the 1970s and in the 1980s manufactured industrial plastics and coatings using PFAS compounds. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 1:01 pm
References [6] In re E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co., 476 F.2d 1357, 177 USPQ 563 (CCPA 1973).[7] In re Mighty Leaf Tea, 601 F.3d 1342, 94 USPQ2d 1257, 1259 (Fed. [read post]
