Search for: "Duncan v State" Results 221 - 240 of 758
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2017, 7:19 am by Bill Marler
.: A Settlement has been reached in the lawsuit entitled Cody Werkmeister v. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 2:05 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
., Mary Ann Glendon—an interesting debate on the right over what IP is and whether it’s a right; Julie Cohen: rights talk in privacy v. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 9:30 am by Hannah Curtain & George Mallett
In McDonald v McDonald & Ors [2016] UKSC 28 the Supreme Court have confirmed that possession proceedings brought by private landlords are not subject to the same proportionality tests that apply to public sector proceedings. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Footnote 2 in Stewart states: Consistent with its statutory purpose, the Sheriff's resort to Civil Service Law §71 was presumably 'to secure a steady, reliable, and adequate work force' (Matter of Duncan v New York State Dev. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 12:15 pm by Giles Peaker
Our thanks for this county court possession and deposit appeal case note to Josephine Henderson of Five Paper Chambers and Dambudzo Tenner of Duncan Lewis Amak Property Investments (London) Ltd v Laura Sonny B01CL657. 15 September 2016, The County Court at Central London This was an appeal of the dismissal of a set aside application following a possession order being made under the accelerated procedure without a hearing. [read post]
15 Oct 2016, 7:01 am by Mark S. Humphreys
State Automotive Mutual Insurance Company, Jennifer Caldwell, and Danny Duncan d/b/a Duncan Insurance Agency. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 7:01 am by Mark S. Humphreys
State Automotive Mutual Insurance Company, Jennifer Caldwell, and Danny Duncan d/b/a Duncan Insurance Agency. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 4:00 am by Berniard Law Firm
In examining this problem, the appeals court looked to the Louisiana Supreme Court, and its decision in Duncan v. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 4:25 am by Howard Friedman
Lopez in the Supreme Court, and were decided below sub. nom Duncan v. [read post]