Search for: "Dupont v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 241
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Oct 2014, 7:15 am by Gene Quinn
This updating of the strategic vision for innovation in the United States was the subject of this Federal Register Notice. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 7:17 pm by Nikki Siesel
Lucky 13 further claims that Swift had filed about sixty federal trademark applications with the United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
21 May 2014, 8:42 pm
(collectively “DuPont”) appeal from the orders of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri imposing sanctions on DuPont by striking DuPont’s contract reformation defense and counterclaims and awarding Monsanto Company and Monsanto Technology, LLC (collectively “Monsanto”) attorney fees. [read post]
13 May 2014, 1:08 pm
” See also People v Dupont, 107 AD2d 247, 253 [1st Dept 1985] [observing that the statute's vagueness is apparent because "[i]t is not clear what is meant by communication ‘in a manner likely to cause annoyance or alarm’ to another person”]). [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:16 am by Joy Waltemath
To resolve the problem, DuPont and the union agreed to a deadline by which unit employees had to choose whether to stay with DuPont or move to the new company. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by Brian Clarke
Levy was a top Supreme Court advocate, having argued 16 times before the Court and, in January 2009, won a 9-0 victory for DuPont in an important ERISA case (Kennedy v. [read post]
16 Feb 2014, 9:34 am by Eric Goldman
  A: John O’Brien (assigned to DuPont),  and Polysaccharide Fibers. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 11:54 am
  Procedural HistoryThis suit was filed by The Ohio Willow Wood Company (“OWW”) against Alps South, LLC (“Alps”) for in- fringement of United States Patent No. 5,830,237 (the “’237 patent”). [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm by Ron Coleman
Applicant argued that the nature of the involved goods is “irrelevant,” as are all the other duPont factors (except one), because the marks are so different. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 1:45 pm by Ed. Microjuris.com Puerto Rico
Robert Castillo, Chief Judge for the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois 15 justices attended the convention, including Hon. [read post]
3 Aug 2013, 7:44 am by Eric Muller
Julius graduated from high school in May 1954, the very month the United States Supreme Court announced its landmark ruling in Brown v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 2:37 pm by Gene Quinn
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit recently issued a decision in Novozymes v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 9:14 am by James Yang
To get a patent, a patent application must be filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office to satisfy the written description requirement. [read post]