Search for: "Dykes v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 109
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Feb 2011, 1:49 pm by Bexis
  The plaintiff also advanced Arkansas state pharmacy regulations, but none of these created any duty of pharmacists to warn either patients or prescribing physicians. [read post]
8 Jul 2017, 5:17 am by David Meyer Lindenberg
But they conveniently forget that America, after a less than promising start marred by the likes of Dred Scott v. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 7:41 pm by Schachtman
  The Harris Court cited, with approval, a 2002 traumatic cancer case, State ex rel. [read post]
25 Nov 2012, 2:28 pm by Daniel Isenberg
Awuku, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWHC 3298 (Admin) - QBD President names and shames 3 solicitors who failed disclosure duties in without notice removal stay applications. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 2:00 am by INFORRM
Journalism and the PCC There are no adjudicated PCC rulings to report, but several “resolved” cases including: Miss Catherine Lemon v Western Daily Press (Clause 1, 20/01/2012); A woman v The People (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); A woman v Daily Mail (Clauses 3, 6, 9, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Ayr Advertiser (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Mr Alan Shannon v Sunday Mail (Clause 1, 19/01/2012); Dr Esther Hobson v The Star (Sheffield)… [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 11:45 am by Steve Baird
And, unlike the Dykes on Bikes case, where substantial evidence was made of record to show the claimed mark non-disparaging at the time of registration, the same kind of evidence was not produced by Mr. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 10:09 am by Darren Rosenblum
As I think is often the case (witness the Boies/Olsen Perry v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 9:20 am by Bexis
- New FDA draft guidance that would change "intended use" based upon mere knowledge of off-label use - Link.June 2, 2011:  The Closing Of The Learned Intermediary Frontier - Updated 50-state learned intermediary rule survey occasioned by first Rhode Island precedent on rule - Link.June 1, 2011:  While Plaintiff Slept, Learned Intermediary Got a Re-affirming Wake Up - New (Dykes) decision where lazy plaintiff lost a learned intermediary motion - Link. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 1:01 am by INFORRM
(In this respect it’s worth remembering that when Clare Balding complained successfully to IPSO about being called a ‘dyke on a bike’ by A.A. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Not a coincidence that Dykes w/ Bikes was rejected, or that Heeb was rejected, but Redskins was approved and a 50-page federal opinion defends it. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 7:00 am by Bexis
Appx. 846, 849 (5th Cir. 2004) (the prescriber “acknowledges that he never read the warning . . . therefore, [defendant’s] warning (adequate or inadequate) played no role in the events leading to [plaintiff’s] injury”) (applying Louisiana law); Dykes v. [read post]